Complex Societies and the Growth of the Law
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While a large number of informal factors influence how people interact, modern societies rely upon law as a primary mechanism to formally control human behaviour. How legal rules impact societal development depends on the interplay between two types of actors: the people who create the rules and the people to which the rules potentially apply. We hypothesise that an increasingly diverse and interconnected society might create increasingly diverse and interconnected rules, and assert that legal networks provide a useful lens through which to observe the interaction between law and society. To evaluate these propositions, we present a novel and generalizable model of statutory materials as multidimensional, time-evolving document networks. Applying this model to the federal legislation of the United States and Germany, we find impressive expansion in the size and complexity of laws over the past two and a half decades. We investigate the sources of this development using methods from network science and natural language processing. To allow for cross-country comparisons over time, we algorithmically reorganise the legislative materials of the United States and Germany into cluster families that reflect legal topics. This reorganisation reveals that the main driver behind the growth of the law in both jurisdictions is the expansion of the welfare state, backed by an expansion of the tax state.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 302
- 2022GPT Takes the Bar Examcited by 65
- 2023Natural Language Processing in the Legal Domaincited by 38
- 2022Law Informs Code: A Legal Informatics Approach to Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humanscited by 23
- 2024LLM vs. Lawyers: Identifying a Subset of Summary Judgments in a Large UK Case Law Datasetcited by 8
- 2021The Legislative Recipe: Syntax for Machine-Readable Legislationcited by 2
- 2021Simplify Your Law: Using Information Theory to Deduplicate Legal Documentscited by 2
- 2025Aligning Language Models for Icelandic Legal Text Summarizationcited by 1
- 2026Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answeringcited by 1
- 2021Law Smells: Defining and Detecting Problematic Patterns in Legal Draftingcited by 0
- 2024A Method for Detecting Legal Article Competition for Korean Criminal Law Using a Case-augmented Mention Graphcited by 0
- 2025LLMs for Legal Subsumption in German Employment Contractscited by 0
- 2026Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering28 May 2026
- 2025LLMs for Legal Subsumption in German Employment Contracts2 Jul 2025
- 2025Aligning Language Models for Icelandic Legal Text Summarization25 Apr 2025
- 2024A Method for Detecting Legal Article Competition for Korean Criminal Law Using a Case-augmented Mention Graph16 Dec 2024
- 2024LLM vs. Lawyers: Identifying a Subset of Summary Judgments in a Large UK Case Law Dataset4 Mar 2024
- 2023Natural Language Processing in the Legal Domain23 Feb 2023
- 2022GPT Takes the Bar Exam29 Dec 2022
- 2022Law Informs Code: A Legal Informatics Approach to Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans14 Sep 2022
- 2021Law Smells: Defining and Detecting Problematic Patterns in Legal Drafting15 Oct 2021
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English3 Oct 2021
- 2021Simplify Your Law: Using Information Theory to Deduplicate Legal Documents2 Oct 2021
- 2021The Legislative Recipe: Syntax for Machine-Readable Legislation19 Aug 2021