Early Concept Drift Detection via Prediction Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Concept drift, characterized by unpredictable changes in data distribution over time, poses significant challenges to machine learning models in streaming data scenarios. Although error rate-based concept drift detectors are widely used, they often fail to identify drift in the early stages when the data distribution changes but error rates remain constant. This paper introduces the Prediction Uncertainty Index (PU-index), derived from the prediction uncertainty of the classifier, as a superior alternative to the error rate for drift detection. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that: (1) The PU-index can detect drift even when error rates remain stable. (2) Any change in the error rate will lead to a corresponding change in the PU-index. These properties make the PU-index a more sensitive and robust indicator for drift detection compared to existing methods. We also propose a PU-index-based Drift Detector (PUDD) that employs a novel Adaptive PU-index Bucketing algorithm for detecting drift. Empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate PUDD's efficacy in detecting drift in structured and image data.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2024.
Builds on
12 of 53 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
- 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 421
- 2020River: machine learning for streaming data in Pythoncited by 96
- 2021Conditional Distributional Treatment Effect with Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddings and U-Statistic Regressioncited by 40
- 2020Reactive Soft Prototype Computing for Concept Drift Streamscited by 39
- 2022DDG-DA: Data Distribution Generation for Predictable Concept Drift Adaptationcited by 36
- 2019AMF: Aggregated Mondrian Forests for Online Learningcited by 17
- 2023Online Boosting Adaptive Learning under Concept Drift for Multistream Classificationcited by 17
- 2024Online Drift Detection with Maximum Concept Discrepancycited by 12
- 2020Concept Drift Detection via Equal Intensity k-means Space Partitioningcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.
8 papers.
- 2025Drift-aware Collaborative Assistance Mixture of Experts for Heterogeneous Multistream Learningcited by 14
- 2025Learning Robust Spectral Dynamics for Temporal Domain Generalizationcited by 13
- 2025TRACE: A Generalizable Drift Detector for Streaming Data-Driven Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026Pitfalls of Unlabeled Disagreement-Based Drift Detection in Streaming Tree Ensemblescited by 2
- 2026The Window Dilemma: Why Concept Drift Detection is Ill-Posedcited by 1
- 2026Autonomous Drift Learning in Data Streams: A Unified Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026FreKoo++: Learning Continuous Spectral Dynamics for Temporal Domain Generalizationcited by 0
- 2026Concept Drift from a Causal Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Concept Drift from a Causal Perspective21 Sep 2026
- 2026FreKoo++: Learning Continuous Spectral Dynamics for Temporal Domain Generalization23 Aug 2026
- 2026Pitfalls of Unlabeled Disagreement-Based Drift Detection in Streaming Tree Ensembles12 May 2026
- 2026Autonomous Drift Learning in Data Streams: A Unified Perspective2 May 2026
- 2026The Window Dilemma: Why Concept Drift Detection is Ill-Posed6 Feb 2026
- 2025TRACE: A Generalizable Drift Detector for Streaming Data-Driven Optimization8 Dec 2025
- 2025Drift-aware Collaborative Assistance Mixture of Experts for Heterogeneous Multistream Learning3 Aug 2025
- 2025Learning Robust Spectral Dynamics for Temporal Domain Generalization19 May 2025