Concept Drift Detection via Equal Intensity k-means Space Partitioning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data stream poses additional challenges to statistical classification tasks because distributions of the training and target samples may differ as time passes. Such distribution change in streaming data is called concept drift. Numerous histogram-based distribution change detection methods have been proposed to detect drift. Most histograms are developed on grid-based or tree-based space partitioning algorithms which makes the space partitions arbitrary, unexplainable, and may cause drift blind-spots. There is a need to improve the drift detection accuracy for histogram-based methods with the unsupervised setting. To address this problem, we propose a cluster-based histogram, called equal intensity k-means space partitioning (EI-kMeans). In addition, a heuristic method to improve the sensitivity of drift detection is introduced. The fundamental idea of improving the sensitivity is to minimize the risk of creating partitions in distribution offset regions. Pearson's chi-square test is used as the statistical hypothesis test so that the test statistics remain independent of the sample distribution. The number of bins and their shapes, which strongly influence the ability to detect drift, are determined dynamically from the sample based on an asymptotic constraint in the chi-square test. Accordingly, three algorithms are developed to implement concept drift detection, including a greedy centroids initialization algorithm, a cluster amplify-shrink algorithm, and a drift detection algorithm. For drift adaptation, we recommend retraining the learner if a drift is detected. The results of experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the advantages of EI-kMeans and show its efficacy in detecting concept drift.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2024Early Concept Drift Detection via Prediction Uncertaintycited by 8
- 2023Measuring Distributional Shifts in Text: The Advantage of Language Model-Based Embeddingscited by 2
- 2026Learning Unbiased Cluster Descriptors for Interpretable Imbalanced Concept Drift Detectioncited by 2
- 2021Real-time Drift Detection on Time-series Datacited by 1
- 2024A Neighbor-Searching Discrepancy-based Drift Detection Scheme for Learning Evolving Datacited by 1
- 2026Drift Localization using Conformal Predictionscited by 0
- 2026Cluster-Specific Localized Drift Detection for Efficient Batch Model Adaptation under Controlled Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026Dimension-Calibrated Unexplained Mass: An Interpretable Drift Statistic for Contamination Monitoring in Data Streamscited by 0
- 2026Dimension-Calibrated Unexplained Mass: An Interpretable Drift Statistic for Contamination Monitoring in Data Streams18 Jul 2026
- 2026Cluster-Specific Localized Drift Detection for Efficient Batch Model Adaptation under Controlled Distribution Shift20 Jun 2026
- 2026Learning Unbiased Cluster Descriptors for Interpretable Imbalanced Concept Drift Detection6 Mar 2026
- 2026Drift Localization using Conformal Predictions23 Feb 2026
- 2024Early Concept Drift Detection via Prediction Uncertainty15 Dec 2024
- 2024A Neighbor-Searching Discrepancy-based Drift Detection Scheme for Learning Evolving Data23 May 2024
- 2023Measuring Distributional Shifts in Text: The Advantage of Language Model-Based Embeddings4 Dec 2023
- 2021Real-time Drift Detection on Time-series Data12 Oct 2021