mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing Fairness of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing Models

arXiv 2412.09900 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) algorithms play a critical role in decision-making across various domains, such as healthcare, finance, education, and law enforcement. However, concerns about fairness and bias in these systems have raised significant ethical and social challenges. To address these challenges, this research utilizes two prominent fairness libraries, Fairlearn by Microsoft and AIF360 by IBM. These libraries offer comprehensive frameworks for fairness analysis, providing tools to evaluate fairness metrics, visualize results, and implement bias mitigation algorithms. The study focuses on assessing and mitigating biases for unstructured datasets using Computer Vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) models. The primary objective is to present a comparative analysis of the performance of mitigation algorithms from the two fairness libraries. This analysis involves applying the algorithms individually, one at a time, in one of the stages of the ML lifecycle, pre-processing, in-processing, or post-processing, as well as sequentially across more than one stage. The results reveal that some sequential applications improve the performance of mitigation algorithms by effectively reducing bias while maintaining the model's performance. Publicly available datasets from Kaggle were chosen for this research, providing a practical context for evaluating fairness in real-world machine learning workflows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  5. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  6. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  9. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  10. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  11. 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
  12. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 149
6 more
  1. 2018The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism predictioncited by 53
  2. 2023The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by defaultcited by 36
  3. 2019Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmapcited by 22
  4. 2019Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairnesscited by 16
  5. 2024Fairness in Algorithmic Recourse Through the Lens of Substantive Equality of Opportunitycited by 9
  6. 2024On the (In)Compatibility between Group Fairness and Individual Fairnesscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.