mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Impact of Post-editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experience

arXiv 2101.06125 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article presents the results of a study involving the translation of a fictional story from English into Catalan in three modalities: machine-translated (MT), post-edited (MTPE) and translated without aid (HT). Each translation was analysed to evaluate its creativity. Subsequently, a cohort of 88 Catalan participants read the story in a randomly assigned modality and completed a survey. The results show that HT presented a higher creativity score if compared to MTPE and MT. HT also ranked higher in narrative engagement, and translation reception, while MTPE ranked marginally higher in enjoyment. HT and MTPE show no statistically significant differences in any category, whereas MT does in all variables tested. We conclude that creativity is highest when professional translators intervene in the process, especially when working without any aid. We hypothesize that creativity in translation could be the factor that enhances reading engagement and the reception of translated literary texts.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2021.

Builds on

4 of 62 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translationcited by 45
  3. 2019Post-editese: an Exacerbated Translationesecited by 29
  4. 2020Machine Translation of Novels in the Age of Transformercited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

10 papers.