mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FaceX: Understanding Face Attribute Classifiers through Summary Model Explanations

arXiv 2412.07313 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches are widely applied for identifying fairness issues in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. However, in the context of facial analysis, existing XAI approaches, such as pixel attribution methods, offer explanations for individual images, posing challenges in assessing the overall behavior of a model, which would require labor-intensive manual inspection of a very large number of instances and leaving to the human the task of drawing a general impression of the model behavior from the individual outputs. Addressing this limitation, we introduce FaceX, the first method that provides a comprehensive understanding of face attribute classifiers through summary model explanations. Specifically, FaceX leverages the presence of distinct regions across all facial images to compute a region-level aggregation of model activations, allowing for the visualization of the model's region attribution across 19 predefined regions of interest in facial images, such as hair, ears, or skin. Beyond spatial explanations, FaceX enhances interpretability by visualizing specific image patches with the highest impact on the model's decisions for each facial region within a test benchmark. Through extensive evaluation in various experimental setups, including scenarios with or without intentional biases and mitigation efforts on four benchmarks, namely CelebA, FairFace, CelebAMask-HQ, and Racial Faces in the Wild, FaceX demonstrates high effectiveness in identifying the models' biases.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

Builds on

21 of 43 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  8. 2019MaskGAN: Towards Diverse and Interactive Facial Image Manipulationcited by 628
  9. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  10. 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
  11. 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
  12. 2020Use HiResCAM instead of Grad-CAM for faithful explanations of convolutional neural networkscited by 79
9 more
  1. 2016Towards Better Analysis of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 51
  2. 2020Gender Slopes: Counterfactual Fairness for Computer Vision Models by Attribute Manipulationcited by 37
  3. 2019Global Explanations of Neural Networks: Mapping the Landscape of Predictionscited by 32
  4. 2017Examining CNN Representations with respect to Dataset Biascited by 27
  5. 2020Understanding Fairness of Gender Classification Algorithms Across Gender-Race Groupscited by 24
  6. 2020Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitmentcited by 21
  7. 2021Measuring Hidden Bias within Face Recognition via Racial Phenotypescited by 16
  8. 2023Towards Fair Face Verification: An In-depth Analysis of Demographic Biasescited by 14
  9. 2020Uncovering the Bias in Facial Expressionscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.