mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Fairness of Gender Classification Algorithms Across Gender-Race Groups

arXiv 2009.11491 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2020cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated gender classification has important applications in many domains, such as demographic research, law enforcement, online advertising, as well as human-computer interaction. Recent research has questioned the fairness of this technology across gender and race. Specifically, the majority of the studies raised the concern of higher error rates of the face-based gender classification system for darker-skinned people like African-American and for women. However, to date, the majority of existing studies were limited to African-American and Caucasian only. The aim of this paper is to investigate the differential performance of the gender classification algorithms across gender-race groups. To this aim, we investigate the impact of (a) architectural differences in the deep learning algorithms and (b) training set imbalance, as a potential source of bias causing differential performance across gender and race. Experimental investigations are conducted on two latest large-scale publicly available facial attribute datasets, namely, UTKFace and FairFace. The experimental results suggested that the algorithms with architectural differences varied in performance with consistency towards specific gender-race groups. For instance, for all the algorithms used, Black females (Black race in general) always obtained the least accuracy rates. Middle Eastern males and Latino females obtained higher accuracy rates most of the time. Training set imbalance further widens the gap in the unequal accuracy rates across all gender-race groups. Further investigations using facial landmarks suggested that facial morphological differences due to the bone structure influenced by genetic and environmental factors could be the cause of the least performance of Black females and Black race, in general.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 7; 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 4.

24 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 66
  2. 2025T2ISafety: Benchmark for Assessing Fairness, Toxicity, and Privacy in Image Generationcited by 47
  3. 2022GBDF: Gender Balanced DeepFake Dataset Towards Fair DeepFake Detectioncited by 32
  4. 2022FairGRAPE: Fairness-aware GRAdient Pruning mEthod for Face Attribute Classificationcited by 30
  5. 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
  6. 2022An Examination of Bias of Facial Analysis based BMI Prediction Modelscited by 10
  7. 2021Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutionscited by 7
  8. 2022Deep Generative Views to Mitigate Gender Classification Bias Across Gender-Race Groupscited by 7
  9. 2021On The State of Data In Computer Vision: Human Annotations Remain Indispensable for Developing Deep Learning Modelscited by 6
  10. 2022Fairness Increases Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 5
  11. 2023The Casual Conversations v2 Datasetcited by 4
  12. 2021Harnessing Unlabeled Data to Improve Generalization of Biometric Gender and Age Classifierscited by 3
12 more
  1. 2024Regulation Games for Trustworthy Machine Learningcited by 3
  2. 2024FineFACE: Fair Facial Attribute Classification Leveraging Fine-grained Featurescited by 3
  3. 2024A Self-Supervised Learning Pipeline for Demographically Fair Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 2
  4. 2024FaceX: Understanding Face Attribute Classifiers through Summary Model Explanationscited by 2
  5. 2025Decoupling Bias, Aligning Distributions: Synergistic Fairness Optimization for Deepfake Detectioncited by 2
  6. 2021Investigating Fairness of Ocular Biometrics Among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adultscited by 1
  7. 2022Can GAN-induced Attribute Manipulations Impact Face Recognition?cited by 1
  8. 2022Is Facial Recognition Biased at Near-Infrared Spectrum As Well?cited by 1
  9. 2024Improving Bias in Facial Attribute Classification: A Combined Impact of KL Divergence induced Loss Function and Dual Attentioncited by 1
  10. 2024Generalizing Orthogonalization for Models with Non-Linearitiescited by 0
  11. 2025Auditing and Mitigating Bias in Gender Classification Algorithms: A Data-Centric Approachcited by 0
  12. 2025Leveraging Text Guidance for Enhancing Demographic Fairness in Gender Classificationcited by 0