mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Autonomy in Human-on-the-Loop Vision-Based Robotics Systems

arXiv 2103.15053 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2021cs.SE cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer vision approaches are widely used by autonomous robotic systems to sense the world around them and to guide their decision making as they perform diverse tasks such as collision avoidance, search and rescue, and object manipulation. High accuracy is critical, particularly for Human-on-the-loop (HoTL) systems where decisions are made autonomously by the system, and humans play only a supervisory role. Failures of the vision model can lead to erroneous decisions with potentially life or death consequences. In this paper, we propose a solution based upon adaptive autonomy levels, whereby the system detects loss of reliability of these models and responds by temporarily lowering its own autonomy levels and increasing engagement of the human in the decision-making process. Our solution is applicable for vision-based tasks in which humans have time to react and provide guidance. When implemented, our approach would estimate the reliability of the vision task by considering uncertainty in its model, and by performing covariate analysis to determine when the current operating environment is ill-matched to the model's training data. We provide examples from DroneResponse, in which small Unmanned Aerial Systems are deployed for Emergency Response missions, and show how the vision model's reliability would be used in addition to confidence scores to drive and specify the behavior and adaptation of the system's autonomy. This workshop paper outlines our proposed approach and describes open challenges at the intersection of Computer Vision and Software Engineering for the safe and reliable deployment of vision models in the decision making of autonomous systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2021.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  7. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  9. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  10. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  11. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  12. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 183
8 more
  1. 2019A General Framework for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learningcited by 119
  2. 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
  3. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Computational Photography and Visual Recognitioncited by 15
  4. 2020The Next Generation of Human-Drone Partnerships: Co-Designing an Emergency Response Systemcited by 7
  5. 2019Human-in-the-loop Robotic Manipulation Planning for Collaborative Assemblycited by 3
  6. 2020Model-Driven Requirements for Humans-on-the-Loop Multi-UAV Missionscited by 2
  7. 2018How Do Practitioners Perceive Assurance Cases in Safety-Critical Software Systems?cited by 1
  8. 2020Modeling Score Distributions and Continuous Covariates: A Bayesian Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.