Learn More by Using Less: Distributed Learning with Energy-Constrained Devices
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a solution for distributed model training across decentralized, privacy-preserving devices, but the different energy capacities of participating devices (system heterogeneity) constrain real-world implementations. These energy limitations not only reduce model accuracy but also increase dropout rates, impacting on convergence in practical FL deployments. In this work, we propose LeanFed, an energy-aware FL framework designed to optimize client selection and training workloads on battery-constrained devices. LeanFed leverages adaptive data usage by dynamically adjusting the fraction of local data each device utilizes during training, thereby maximizing device participation across communication rounds while ensuring they do not run out of battery during the process. We rigorously evaluate LeanFed against traditional FedAvg on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets, simulating various levels of data heterogeneity and device participation rates. Results show that LeanFed consistently enhances model accuracy and stability, particularly in settings with high data heterogeneity and limited battery life, by mitigating client dropout and extending device availability. This approach demonstrates the potential of energy-efficient, privacy-preserving FL in real-world, large-scale applications, setting a foundation for robust and sustainable pervasive AI on resource-constrained networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
References · 17
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
- 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 345
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 196
- 2019A Survey on Distributed Machine Learningcited by 187
5 more
- 2021Distributed Learning in Wireless Networks: Recent Progress and Future Challengescited by 125
- 2022The Cost of Training Machine Learning Models over Distributed Data Sourcescited by 18
- 2022Towards Energy-Aware Federated Learning on Battery-Powered Clientscited by 11
- 2023Mini-Batch Optimization of Contrastive Losscited by 8
- 2024Why Go Full? Elevating Federated Learning Through Partial Network Updatescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.