mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

arXiv 2412.02279 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered increasing attention in the field of natural language processing, revolutionizing numerous downstream tasks with powerful reasoning and generation abilities. For example, In-Context Learning (ICL) introduces a fine-tuning-free paradigm, allowing out-of-the-box LLMs to execute downstream tasks by analogy learning without any fine-tuning. Besides, in a fine-tuning-dependent paradigm where substantial training data exists, Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), as the cost-effective methods, enable LLMs to achieve excellent performance comparable to full fine-tuning. However, these fascinating techniques employed by LLMs have not been fully exploited in the ABSA field. Previous works probe LLMs in ABSA by merely using randomly selected input-output pairs as demonstrations in ICL, resulting in an incomplete and superficial evaluation. In this paper, we shed light on a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs in the ABSA field, involving 13 datasets, 8 ABSA subtasks, and 6 LLMs. Specifically, we design a unified task formulation to unify ``multiple LLMs for multiple ABSA subtasks in multiple paradigms.'' For the fine-tuning-dependent paradigm, we efficiently fine-tune LLMs using instruction-based multi-task learning. For the fine-tuning-free paradigm, we propose 3 demonstration selection strategies to stimulate the few-shot abilities of LLMs. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that LLMs achieve a new state-of-the-art performance compared to fine-tuned Small Language Models (SLMs) in the fine-tuning-dependent paradigm. More importantly, in the fine-tuning-free paradigm where SLMs are ineffective, LLMs with ICL still showcase impressive potential and even compete with fine-tuned SLMs on some ABSA subtasks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.

Builds on

19 of 53 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  6. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  7. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  8. 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 843
  9. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
  10. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  11. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  12. 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 268
7 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 185
  2. 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 160
  3. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Studycited by 96
  4. 2023Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?cited by 54
  5. 2023A Wide Evaluation of ChatGPT on Affective Computing Taskscited by 30
  6. 2023Large language models for aspect-based sentiment analysiscited by 17
  7. 2023The Limits of ChatGPT in Extracting Aspect-Category-Opinion-Sentiment Quadruples: A Comparative Analysiscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.