mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic Anchor Transport: Robust Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2411.17002 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Large pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have shown unprecedented zero-shot performance across a wide range of tasks. Nevertheless, these models may be unreliable under distributional shifts, as their performance is significantly degraded. In this work, we investigate how to efficiently utilize class text information to mitigate distribution drifts encountered by VLMs during inference. In particular, we propose generating pseudo-labels for the noisy test-time samples by aligning visual embeddings with reliable, text-based semantic anchors. Specifically, to maintain the regular structure of the dataset properly, we formulate the problem as a batch-wise label assignment, which is efficiently solved using Optimal Transport. Our method, Semantic Anchor Transport (SAT), utilizes such pseudo-labels as supervisory signals for test-time adaptation, yielding a principled cross-modal alignment solution. Moreover, SAT further leverages heterogeneous textual clues, with a multi-template distillation approach that replicates multi-view contrastive learning strategies in unsupervised representation learning without incurring additional computational complexity. Extensive experiments on multiple popular test-time adaptation benchmarks presenting diverse complexity empirically show the superiority of SAT, achieving consistent performance gains over recent state-of-the-art methods, yet being computationally efficient.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

Builds on

32 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024WATT: Weight Average Test-Time Adaptation of CLIP19 Jun
  2. 2024A Lost Opportunity for Vision-Language Models: A Comparative Study of Online Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models23 May
  3. 2023A Closer Look at the Few-Shot Adaptation of Large Vision-Language Models20 Dec
  4. 2022Task Residual for Tuning Vision-Language Models18 Nov
  5. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  6. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct

Other references · 26

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  3. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  4. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  5. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  6. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
  7. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  8. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  9. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  10. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 525
  11. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  12. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
14 more
  1. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  2. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  3. 2016Joint Unsupervised Learning of Deep Representations and Image Clusterscited by 205
  4. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 197
  5. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 185
  6. 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 149
  7. 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
  8. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  9. 2019ClusterFit: Improving Generalization of Visual Representationscited by 82
  10. 2019Unsupervised Deep Learning by Neighbourhood Discoverycited by 78
  11. 2022Improving Test-Time Adaptation via Shift-agnostic Weight Regularization and Nearest Source Prototypescited by 67
  12. 2019Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Multimodal Distribution Alignmentcited by 38
  13. 2018Deep clustering: On the link between discriminative models and K-meanscited by 37
  14. 2024OT-VP: Optimal Transport-guided Visual Prompting for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Inference to Adaptation: A Unified Optimal Transport View of Vision Language Model
  2. 2026Robustifying Vision-Language Models via Test-Time Prompt Adaptation
  3. 2026Dual-Modality Anchor-Guided Filtering for Test-time Prompt Tuning
  4. 2026Gram-Anchored Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models via Second-Order Statistics
  5. 2026Dual-Stream Semantic Guidance with Prototype Anchor Calibration for Source-Fully-Free Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Efficient and Context-Aware Label Propagation for Zero-/Few-Shot Training-Free Adaptation of Vision-Language Model
  7. 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Why Vision Fails as a Universal Bridge: Rectifying Modality Asynchrony in Multilingual MLLMs