mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dual-Modality Anchor-Guided Filtering for Test-time Prompt Tuning

arXiv 2604.12403 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-Time Prompt Tuning (TPT) adapts vision-language models using augmented views, but its effectiveness is hindered by the challenge of determining which views are beneficial. Standard entropy-based filtering relies on the internal confidence scores of the model, which are often miscalibrated under distribution shift, assigning high confidence to irrelevant crops or background regions while ignoring semantic content. To address this, we propose a dual-modality anchor-guided framework that grounds view selection in semantic evidence. We introduce a text anchor from attribute-rich descriptions, to provide fine-grained class semantics, and an adaptive image anchor that captures evolving test-time statistics. Using these anchors, we filter views based on alignment and confidence, ensuring that only informative views guide adaptation. Moreover, we treat the anchors as auxiliary predictive heads and combine their predictions with the original output in a confidence-weighted ensemble, yielding a stable supervision signal for prompt updates. Extensive experiments on 15 benchmark datasets demonstrate new state-of-the-art performance, highlighting the contribution of anchor-guided supervision as a foundation for robust prompt updates.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

31 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ProAPO: Progressively Automatic Prompt Optimization for Visual Classification27 Feb
  2. 2025DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning27 Jan
  3. 2024Understanding and Mitigating Miscalibration in Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models3 Oct
  4. 2024AWT: Transferring Vision-Language Models via Augmentation, Weighting, and Transportation5 Jul
  5. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion21 Mar
  6. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalization2 Nov
  7. 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning11 Aug
  8. 2023Enhancing CLIP with GPT-4: Harnessing Visual Descriptions as Prompts21 Jul
  9. 2023Consistency-guided Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models1 Jun
  10. 2022Understanding and Mitigating Overfitting in Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models4 Nov
  11. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  12. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
1 more
  1. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 18

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  4. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  6. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  7. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  8. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  9. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  10. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  11. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
  12. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
6 more
  1. 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 267
  2. 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
  3. 2022I2MVFormer: Large Language Model Generated Multi-View Document Supervision for Zero-Shot Image Classificationcited by 54
  4. 2023A Simple Zero-shot Prompt Weighting Technique to Improve Prompt Ensembling in Text-Image Modelscited by 39
  5. 2024Any-Shift Prompting for Generalization over Distributionscited by 24
  6. 2025Exploring CLIP's Dense Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Fine-Grained Robustness: Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025MetaTPT: Meta Test-time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Doubly Debiased Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025MINT: Memory-Infused Prompt Tuning at Test-time for CLIP
  5. 2026SS-TPT: Stability and Suitability-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Semantic Anchor Transport: Robust Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025A Closer Look at Conditional Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models