Revisiting Marr in Face: The Building of 2D--2.5D--3D Representations in Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
David Marr's seminal theory of vision proposes that the human visual system operates through a sequence of three stages, known as the 2D sketch, the 2.5D sketch, and the 3D model. In recent years, Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have been widely thought to have reached a level comparable to human vision. However, the mechanisms by which DNNs accomplish this and whether they adhere to Marr's 2D--2.5D--3D construction theory remain unexplored. In this paper, we delve into the perception task to explore these questions and find evidence supporting Marr's theory. We introduce a graphics probe, a sub-network crafted to reconstruct the original image from the network's intermediate layers. The key to the graphics probe is its flexible architecture that supports image in both 2D and 3D formats, as well as in a transitional state between them. By injecting graphics probes into neural networks, and analyzing their behavior in reconstructing images, we find that DNNs initially encode images as 2D representations in low-level layers, and finally construct 3D representations in high-level layers. Intriguingly, in mid-level layers, DNNs exhibit a hybrid state, building a geometric representation that s sur normals within a narrow depth range, akin to the appearance of a low-relief sculpture. This stage resembles the 2.5D representations, providing a view of how DNNs evolve from 2D to 3D in the perception process. The graphics probe therefore serves as a tool for peering into the mechanisms of DNN, providing empirical support for Marr's theory.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2024.
Builds on
26 of 41 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2017Neural 3D Mesh Renderercited by 437
- 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 275
- 2018Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 269
- 2018Pix3D: Dataset and Methods for Single-Image 3D Shape Modelingcited by 218
14 more
- 2019Unsupervised Learning of Probably Symmetric Deformable 3D Objects from Images in the Wildcited by 180
- 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 128
- 2017MarrNet: 3D Shape Reconstruction via 2.5D Sketchescited by 108
- 2018Learning Shape Priors for Single-View 3D Completion and Reconstructioncited by 68
- 2018Facial Landmark Detection: a Literature Surveycited by 63
- 2018Learning to Reconstruct Shapes from Unseen Classescited by 60
- 20173D Shape Reconstruction from Sketches via Multi-view Convolutional Networkscited by 44
- 2016Marr Revisited: 2D-3D Alignment via Surface Normal Predictioncited by 34
- 2018Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in the Face of Caricature: Identity and Image Revealedcited by 16
- 2019How are attributes expressed in face DCNNs?cited by 13
- 2016Face Attribute Prediction Using Off-the-Shelf CNN Featurescited by 10
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network Features and the Original Imagecited by 8
- 2023Graphics Capsule: Learning Hierarchical 3D Face Representations from 2D Imagescited by 3
- 2022Degenerate Swin to Win: Plain Window-based Transformer without Sophisticated Operationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.