Deep Convolutional Neural Network Features and the Original Image
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Face recognition algorithms based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have made progress on the task of recognizing faces in unconstrained viewing conditions. These networks operate with compact feature-based face representations derived from learning a very large number of face images. While the learned features produced by DCNNs can be highly robust to changes in viewpoint, illumination, and appearance, little is known about the nature of the face code that emerges at the top level of such networks. We analyzed the DCNN features produced by two face recognition algorithms. In the first set of experiments we used the top-level features from the DCNNs as input into linear classifiers aimed at predicting metadata about the images. The results show that the DCNN features contain surprisingly accurate information about the yaw and pitch of a face, and about whether the face came from a still image or a video frame. In the second set of experiments, we measured the extent to which individual DCNN features operated in a view-dependent or view-invariant manner. We found that view-dependent coding was a characteristic of the identities rather than the DCNN features - with some identities coded consistently in a view-dependent way and others in a view-independent way. In our third analysis, we visualized the DCNN feature space for over 24,000 images of 500 identities. Images in the center of the space were uniformly of low quality (e.g., extreme views, face occlusion, low resolution). Image quality increased monotonically as a function of distance from the origin. This result suggests that image quality information is available in the DCNN features, such that consistently average feature values reflect coding failures that reliably indicate poor or unusable images. Combined, the results offer insight into the coding mechanisms that support robust representation of faces in DCNNs.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Twin identification over viewpoint change: A deep convolutional neural network surpasses humanscited by 4
- 2025Dissecting Human Body Representations in Deep Networks Trained for Person Identificationcited by 4
- 2022Magnitude-aware Probabilistic Speaker Embeddingscited by 3
- 2025A Quantitative Evaluation of the Expressivity of BMI, Pose and Gender in Body Embeddings for Recognition and Identificationcited by 2
- 2024Local and Global Feature Attention Fusion Network for Face Recognitioncited by 1
- 2024Revisiting Marr in Face: The Building of 2D--2.5D--3D Representations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026AttriBE: Quantifying Attribute Expressivity in Body Embeddings for Recognition and Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond EER: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Information Leakage in Speaker De-Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond EER: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Information Leakage in Speaker De-Identification16 Sep 2026
- 2026AttriBE: Quantifying Attribute Expressivity in Body Embeddings for Recognition and Identification29 Apr 2026
- 2025A Quantitative Evaluation of the Expressivity of BMI, Pose and Gender in Body Embeddings for Recognition and Identification9 Mar 2025
- 2025Dissecting Human Body Representations in Deep Networks Trained for Person Identification21 Feb 2025
- 2024Local and Global Feature Attention Fusion Network for Face Recognition25 Nov 2024
- 2024Revisiting Marr in Face: The Building of 2D--2.5D--3D Representations in Deep Neural Networks25 Nov 2024
- 2022Twin identification over viewpoint change: A deep convolutional neural network surpasses humans12 Jul 2022
- 2022Magnitude-aware Probabilistic Speaker Embeddings28 Feb 2022