mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Degenerate Swin to Win: Plain Window-based Transformer without Sophisticated Operations

arXiv 2211.14255 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The formidable accomplishment of Transformers in natural language processing has motivated the researchers in the computer vision community to build Vision Transformers. Compared with the Convolution Neural Networks (CNN), a Vision Transformer has a larger receptive field which is capable of characterizing the long-range dependencies. Nevertheless, the large receptive field of Vision Transformer is accompanied by the huge computational cost. To boost efficiency, the window-based Vision Transformers emerge. They crop an image into several local windows, and the self-attention is conducted within each window. To bring back the global receptive field, window-based Vision Transformers have devoted a lot of efforts to achieving cross-window communications by developing several sophisticated operations. In this work, we check the necessity of the key design element of Swin Transformer, the shifted window partitioning. We discover that a simple depthwise convolution is sufficient for achieving effective cross-window communications. Specifically, with the existence of the depthwise convolution, the shifted window configuration in Swin Transformer cannot lead to an additional performance improvement. Thus, we degenerate the Swin Transformer to a plain Window-based (Win) Transformer by discarding sophisticated shifted window partitioning. The proposed Win Transformer is conceptually simpler and easier for implementation than Swin Transformer. Meanwhile, our Win Transformer achieves consistently superior performance than Swin Transformer on multiple computer vision tasks, including image recognition, semantic segmentation, and object detection.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2022.

Builds on

49 of 63 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  7. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  10. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  11. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  12. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
37 more
  1. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  2. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  3. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  5. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  6. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  7. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
  8. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  9. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  10. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  11. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
  12. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
  13. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
  14. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
  15. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 632
  16. 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
  17. 2021CSWin Transformer: A General Vision Transformer Backbone with Cross-Shaped Windowscited by 526
  18. 2021LeViT: a Vision Transformer in ConvNet's Clothing for Faster Inferencecited by 475
  19. 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 395
  20. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  21. 2019Attention Augmented Convolutional Networkscited by 363
  22. 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
  23. 2019GCNet: Non-local Networks Meet Squeeze-Excitation Networks and Beyondcited by 331
  24. 2021DeepViT: Towards Deeper Vision Transformercited by 288
  25. 2021Multi-Scale Vision Longformer: A New Vision Transformer for High-Resolution Image Encodingcited by 207
  26. 2022UniFormer: Unified Transformer for Efficient Spatiotemporal Representation Learningcited by 182
  27. 2021CrossFormer: A Versatile Vision Transformer Hinging on Cross-scale Attentioncited by 139
  28. 2020Disentangled Non-Local Neural Networkscited by 132
  29. 2021Shuffle Transformer: Rethinking Spatial Shuffle for Vision Transformercited by 115
  30. 2021Nested Hierarchical Transformer: Towards Accurate, Data-Efficient and Interpretable Visual Understandingcited by 97
  31. 2021Scalable Vision Transformers with Hierarchical Poolingcited by 84
  32. 2021Less is More: Pay Less Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 53
  33. 2021MVT: Multi-view Vision Transformer for 3D Object Recognitioncited by 34
  34. 2020RelationNet++: Bridging Visual Representations for Object Detection via Transformer Decodercited by 31
  35. 2022Defending Backdoor Attacks on Vision Transformer via Patch Processingcited by 19
  36. 2022BOAT: Bilateral Local Attention Vision Transformercited by 12
  37. 2022Boost CTR Prediction for New Advertisements via Modeling Visual Contentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.