A survey of probabilistic generative frameworks for molecular simulations
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative artificial intelligence is now a widely used tool in molecular science. Despite the popularity of probabilistic generative models, numerical experiments benchmarking their performance on molecular data are lacking. In this work, we introduce and explain several classes of generative models, broadly sorted into two categories: flow-based models and diffusion models. We select three representative models: Neural Spline Flows, Conditional Flow Matching, and Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, and examine their accuracy, computational cost, and generation speed across datasets with tunable dimensionality, complexity, and modal asymmetry. Our findings are varied, with no one framework being the best for all purposes. In a nutshell, (i) Neural Spline Flows do best at capturing mode asymmetry present in low-dimensional data, (ii) Conditional Flow Matching outperforms other models for high-dimensional data with low complexity, and (iii) Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models appears the best for low-dimensional data with high complexity. Our datasets include a Gaussian mixture model and the dihedral torsion angle distribution of the Aibtextsubscript9 peptide, generated via a molecular dynamics simulation. We hope our taxonomy of probabilistic generative frameworks and numerical results may guide model selection for a wide range of molecular tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 16 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.
Builds on
16 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep
Other references · 13
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 964
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
- 2022DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Dockingcited by 307
- 2013A survey of the Schr"odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transportcited by 286
- 2023Stochastic interpolants with data-dependent couplingscited by 94
- 2023Simulation-free Schr"odinger bridges via score and flow matchingcited by 81
- 2024Generative artificial intelligence for computational chemistry: a roadmap to predicting emergent phenomenacited by 3
- 2018Boltzmann Generators -- Sampling Equilibrium States of Many-Body Systems with Deep Learningcited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Operator Flow Matching for Timeseries Forecastingcited by 1
- 2025Operator Flow Matching for Timeseries Forecasting16 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Mixed Continuous and Categorical Flow Matching for 3D De Novo Molecule Generation
- 2025Branching Flows: Discrete, Continuous, and Manifold Flow Matching with Splits and Deletions
- 2026Leveraging generative models to assist Monte Carlo sampling
- 2025TFG-Flow: Training-free Guidance in Multimodal Generative Flow
- 2023Equivariant Flow Matching with Hybrid Probability Transport
- 2025FlowMol3: Flow Matching for 3D De Novo Small-Molecule Generation
- 2025Flow Matching Meets Biology and Life Science: A Survey
- 2026Breaking the Bottlenecks: Scalable Diffusion Models for 3D Molecular Generation