mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ExpressivityBench: Can LLMs Communicate Implicitly?

arXiv 2411.08010 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human communication is often implicit, conveying tone, identity, and intent beyond literal meanings. While large language models have achieved strong performance on explicit tasks such as summarization and reasoning, their capacity for expressivity, or implicit communication, remains underexplored. We introduce ExpressivityBench, a framework for evaluating the expressivity of LLMs using information-theoretic communication models. Our approach quantifies how well LLM-generated text communicates target properties without explicit mention, across nine tasks spanning emotion, identity, and tone. To enable scalable and reproducible evaluation, we employ LLM-based graders validated against human judgments. Our results reveal that while models are adept at expressing affective content, they struggle with sociolinguistic signals, lagging behind human baselines. This study provides a necessary step to evaluate human-like implicit communication, with implications for applications such as education, mental health support, and socially-aware dialogue systems. We provide code and data for our benchmark alongside our paper.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

26 of 62 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  5. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  6. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
  7. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
  8. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 301
  9. 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
  10. 2024A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendationscited by 84
  11. 2022FLUTE: Figurative Language Understanding through Textual Explanationscited by 78
  12. 2023COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Taskscited by 69
14 more
  1. 2023Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmarkcited by 62
  2. 2024Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical stylescited by 62
  3. 2024PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilitiescited by 58
  4. 2024"We Need Structured Output": Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Outputcited by 46
  5. 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debatecited by 40
  6. 2024Can Large Language Models Understand Context?cited by 26
  7. 2024Emotion Analysis in NLP: Trends, Gaps and Roadmap for Future Directionscited by 26
  8. 2022Why is constrained neural language generation particularly challenging?cited by 19
  9. 2020Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and Relationshipscited by 17
  10. 2024The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologiescited by 12
  11. 2024Recent Advances in Multimodal Affective Computing: An NLP Perspectivecited by 12
  12. 2022Just-DREAM-about-it: Figurative Language Understanding with DREAM-FLUTEcited by 8
  13. 2023Qbias -- A Dataset on Media Bias in Search Queries and Query Suggestionscited by 5
  14. 2023Competence-Based Analysis of Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.