mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explicit vs. Implicit Biographies: Evaluating and Adapting LLM Information Extraction on Wikidata-Derived Texts

arXiv 2509.14943 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text Implicitness has always been challenging in Natural Language Processing (NLP), with traditional methods relying on explicit statements to identify entities and their relationships. From the sentence "Zuhdi attends church every Sunday", the relationship between Zuhdi and Christianity is evident for a human reader, but it presents a challenge when it must be inferred automatically. Large language models (LLMs) have proven effective in NLP downstream tasks such as text comprehension and information extraction (IE). This study examines how textual implicitness affects IE tasks in pre-trained LLMs: LLaMA 2.3, DeepSeekV1, and Phi1.5. We generate two synthetic datasets of 10k implicit and explicit verbalization of biographic information to measure the impact on LLM performance and analyze whether fine-tuning implicit data improves their ability to generalize in implicit reasoning tasks. This research presents an experiment on the internal reasoning processes of LLMs in IE, particularly in dealing with implicit and explicit contexts. The results demonstrate that fine-tuning LLM models with LoRA (low-rank adaptation) improves their performance in extracting information from implicit texts, contributing to better model interpretability and reliability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.

Builds on

13 of 25 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  6. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  7. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
  8. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
  9. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 244
  10. 2020TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Taskcited by 96
  11. 2021Data Augmentation Approaches in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 82
  12. 2018A Survey on Open Information Extractioncited by 51
1 more
  1. 2024ExpressivityBench: Can LLMs Communicate Implicitly?cited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Biases in Large Language Model-Elicited Text: A Case Study in Natural Language Inference
  2. 2025Implicit Bias in LLMs: A Survey
  3. 2024Hypothesis-only Biases in Large Language Model-Elicited Natural Language Inference
  4. 2025ADAM: A Diverse Archive of Mankind for Evaluating and Enhancing LLMs in Biographical Reasoning
  5. 2024Under the Surface: Tracking the Artifactuality of LLM-Generated Data
  6. 2024Interpreting Bias in Large Language Models: A Feature-Based Approach
  7. 2025Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  8. 2024Where is the answer? Investigating Positional Bias in Language Model Knowledge Extraction