Towards Interpretable and Inference-Optimal COT Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoder-Guided Generation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a novel method that leverages sparse autoencoders (SAEs) and clustering techniques to analyze the internal token representations of large language models (LLMs) and guide generations in mathematical reasoning tasks. Our approach first trains an SAE to generate sparse vector representations for training tokens, then applies k-means clustering to construct a graph where vertices represent token clusters and weighted edges capture sequential token transitions. Using this graph, we define an edge-weight based reward function to quantify adherence to established reasoning traces, thereby identifying exploitative reasoning trajectories. Additionally, we measure generation diversity from clustering to assess the extent of exploration. Our findings indicate that balancing both exploitation and exploration is crucial for achieving high accuracy in mathematical reasoning tasks. During generation, the SAE can serve as a scalable reward model to guide generations, ensuring a balanced trade-off between exploitation and exploration. This prevents extreme behaviors in either direction, ultimately fostering a higher-quality reasoning process in LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
- 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 564
14 more
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruningcited by 278
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2024Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Promptingcited by 208
- 2023Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Futurecited by 184
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
- 2025Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 162
- 2024Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoningcited by 110
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoningcited by 96
- 2023KnowledGPT: Enhancing Large Language Models with Retrieval and Storage Access on Knowledge Basescited by 52
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2024Constrain Alignment with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 11
- 2025LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023Prioritized Trajectory Replay: A Replay Memory for Data-driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Efficient Reasoning via Constrained Optimization in Latent Space
- 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process Interpretation
- 2025A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025MARGE: Improving Math Reasoning for LLMs with Guided Exploration
- 2024System-2 Mathematical Reasoning via Enriched Instruction Tuning
- 2024MC-NEST: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models leveraging a Monte Carlo Self-Refine Tree
- 2025Accurate and Diverse LLM Mathematical Reasoning via Automated PRM-Guided GFlowNets