mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Graph Neural Networks Expose Training Data Properties? An Efficient Risk Assessment Approach

arXiv 2411.03663 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have attracted considerable attention due to their diverse applications. However, the scarcity and quality limitations of graph data present challenges to their training process in practical settings. To facilitate the development of effective GNNs, companies and researchers often seek external collaboration. Yet, directly sharing data raises privacy concerns, motivating data owners to train GNNs on their private graphs and share the trained models. Unfortunately, these models may still inadvertently disclose sensitive properties of their training graphs (e.g., average default rate in a transaction network), leading to severe consequences for data owners. In this work, we study graph property inference attack to identify the risk of sensitive property information leakage from shared models. Existing approaches typically train numerous shadow models for developing such attack, which is computationally intensive and impractical. To address this issue, we propose an efficient graph property inference attack by leveraging model approximation techniques. Our method only requires training a small set of models on graphs, while generating a sufficient number of approximated shadow models for attacks. To enhance diversity while reducing errors in the approximated models, we apply edit distance to quantify the diversity within a group of approximated models and introduce a theoretically guaranteed criterion to evaluate each model's error. Subsequently, we propose a novel selection mechanism to ensure that the retained approximated models achieve high diversity and low error. Extensive experiments across six real-world scenarios demonstrate our method's substantial improvement, with average increases of 2.7% in attack accuracy and 4.1% in ROC-AUC, while being 6.5× faster compared to the best baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.

Builds on

43 of 57 references.

References · 43

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  6. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,477
  7. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  8. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
  9. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
  10. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  11. 2020GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-Trainingcited by 463
  12. 2020GPT-GNN: Generative Pre-Training of Graph Neural Networkscited by 303
31 more
  1. 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
  2. 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 203
  3. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  4. 2021A Survey of Graph Neural Networks for Recommender Systems: Challenges, Methods, and Directionscited by 144
  5. 2021Graph Unlearningcited by 138
  6. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 130
  7. 2019PyTorch-BigGraph: A Large-scale Graph Embedding Systemcited by 119
  8. 2018N-Gram Graph: Simple Unsupervised Representation for Graphs, with Applications to Moleculescited by 93
  9. 2020DGL-KE: Training Knowledge Graph Embeddings at Scalecited by 67
  10. 2021Property Inference From Poisoningcited by 60
  11. 2023GIF: A General Graph Unlearning Strategy via Influence Functioncited by 60
  12. 2020Leakage of Dataset Properties in Multi-Party Machine Learningcited by 47
  13. 2022Certified Graph Unlearningcited by 46
  14. 2021Graph Robustness Benchmark: Benchmarking the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Machine Learningcited by 44
  15. 2021Formalizing and Estimating Distribution Inference Riskscited by 43
  16. 2021Property Inference Attacks Against GANscited by 33
  17. 2022SNAP: Efficient Extraction of Private Properties with Poisoningcited by 31
  18. 2022Unlearning Graph Classifiers with Limited Data Resourcescited by 31
  19. 2023Inductive Graph Unlearningcited by 31
  20. 2024IDEA: A Flexible Framework of Certified Unlearning for Graph Neural Networkscited by 22
  21. 2022Group Property Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural Networkscited by 21
  22. 2021Property Inference Attacks on Convolutional Neural Networks: Influence and Implications of Target Model's Complexitycited by 19
  23. 2020Unsupervised Adversarially-Robust Representation Learning on Graphscited by 17
  24. 2022Characterizing the Influence of Graph Elementscited by 16
  25. 2023Spatiotemporal-Augmented Graph Neural Networks for Human Mobility Simulationcited by 15
  26. 2023Temporal Aggregation and Propagation Graph Neural Networks for Dynamic Representationcited by 8
  27. 2024Unveiling Global Interactive Patterns across Graphs: Towards Interpretable Graph Neural Networkscited by 8
  28. 2015Bitcoin Transaction Graph Analysiscited by 6
  29. 2024Transmission Interface Power Flow Adjustment: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach based on Multi-task Attribution Mapcited by 6
  30. 2020Blindfolded Attackers Still Threatening: Strict Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Graphscited by 4
  31. 2024Unveiling Privacy Vulnerabilities: Investigating the Role of Structure in Graph Datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.