mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Adversarially-Robust Representation Learning on Graphs

arXiv 2012.02486 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.AIcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised/self-supervised pre-training methods for graph representation learning have recently attracted increasing research interests, and they are shown to be able to generalize to various downstream applications. Yet, the adversarial robustness of such pre-trained graph learning models remains largely unexplored. More importantly, most existing defense techniques designed for end-to-end graph representation learning methods require pre-specified label definitions, and thus cannot be directly applied to the pre-training methods. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised defense technique to robustify pre-trained deep graph models, so that the perturbations on the input graph can be successfully identified and blocked before the model is applied to different downstream tasks. Specifically, we introduce a mutual information-based measure, textitgraph representation vulnerability (GRV), to quantify the robustness of graph encoders on the representation space. We then formulate an optimization problem to learn the graph representation by carefully balancing the trade-off between the expressive power and the robustness (i.e., GRV) of the graph encoder. The discrete nature of graph topology and the joint space of graph data make the optimization problem intractable to solve. To handle the above difficulty and to reduce computational expense, we further relax the problem and thus provide an approximate solution. Additionally, we explore a provable connection between the robustness of the unsupervised graph encoder and that of models on downstream tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that even without access to labels and tasks, our model is still able to enhance robustness against adversarial attacks on three downstream tasks (node classification, link prediction, and community detection) by an average of +16.5% compared with existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainabilitycited by 118
  2. 2023Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust?cited by 38
  3. 2023Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation in Graph Transfer Learningcited by 27
  4. 2023Better with Less: A Data-Active Perspective on Pre-Training Graph Neural Networkscited by 14
  5. 2022Robust Node Classification on Graphs: Jointly from Bayesian Label Transition and Topology-based Label Propagationcited by 12
  6. 2024A Survey on Self-Supervised Graph Foundation Models: Knowledge-Based Perspectivecited by 9
  7. 2024Can Modifying Data Address Graph Domain Adaptation?cited by 9
  8. 2023Similarity Preserving Adversarial Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 6
  9. 2022ARIEL: Adversarial Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 5
  10. 2022Toward Enhanced Robustness in Unsupervised Graph Representation Learning: A Graph Information Bottleneck Perspectivecited by 4
  11. 2024Unveiling Privacy Vulnerabilities: Investigating the Role of Structure in Graph Datacited by 3
  12. 2024Can Graph Neural Networks Expose Training Data Properties? An Efficient Risk Assessment Approachcited by 3
5 more
  1. 2025Tree of Preferences for Diversified Recommendationcited by 2
  2. 2023Robust Graph Contrastive Learning with Information Restorationcited by 0
  3. 2026SPGCL: Simple yet Powerful Graph Contrastive Learning via SVD-Guided Structural Perturbationcited by 0
  4. 2026ASPECT: Node-Level Adaptive Spectral Fusion for Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 0
  5. 2026Adversarial Graph Neural Network Benchmarks: Towards Practical and Fair Evaluationcited by 0