mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Expanding Sparse Tuning for Low Memory Usage

arXiv 2411.01800 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is an effective method for adapting pre-trained vision models to downstream tasks by tuning a small subset of parameters. Among PEFT methods, sparse tuning achieves superior performance by only adjusting the weights most relevant to downstream tasks, rather than densely tuning the whole weight matrix. However, this performance improvement has been accompanied by increases in memory usage, which stems from two factors, i.e., the storage of the whole weight matrix as learnable parameters in the optimizer and the additional storage of tunable weight indexes. In this paper, we propose a method named SNELL (Sparse tuning with kerNELized LoRA) for sparse tuning with low memory usage. To achieve low memory usage, SNELL decomposes the tunable matrix for sparsification into two learnable low-rank matrices, saving from the costly storage of the whole original matrix. A competition-based sparsification mechanism is further proposed to avoid the storage of tunable weight indexes. To maintain the effectiveness of sparse tuning with low-rank matrices, we extend the low-rank decomposition by applying nonlinear kernel functions to the whole-matrix merging. Consequently, we gain an increase in the rank of the merged matrix, enhancing the ability of SNELL in adapting the pre-trained models to downstream tasks. Extensive experiments on multiple downstream tasks show that SNELL achieves state-of-the-art performance with low memory usage, endowing PEFT with sparse tuning to large-scale models. Codes are available at https://github.com/ssfgunner/SNELL.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

53 of 64 references.

References · 53

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  9. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  10. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  12. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
38 more
  1. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  2. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  3. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  4. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
  5. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
  6. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 788
  7. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 758
  8. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  9. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  10. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
  11. 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 569
  12. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
  13. 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modelingcited by 431
  14. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  15. 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 352
  16. 2021VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 320
  17. 2021Prompting Visual-Language Models for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 310
  18. 2016EIE: Efficient Inference Engine on Compressed Deep Neural Networkcited by 295
  19. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
  20. 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
  21. 2019Simple, Scalable Adaptation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 242
  22. 2016One-Shot Video Object Segmentationcited by 235
  23. 2016Network Trimming: A Data-Driven Neuron Pruning Approach towards Efficient Deep Architecturescited by 221
  24. 2017Learning to Prune Deep Neural Networks via Layer-wise Optimal Brain Surgeoncited by 221
  25. 2023Sequential Modeling Enables Scalable Learning for Large Vision Modelscited by 212
  26. 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
  27. 2021Raise a Child in Large Language Model: Towards Effective and Generalizable Fine-tuningcited by 146
  28. 2021Composable Sparse Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 144
  29. 2022On the Effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 141
  30. 2017Deep Rewiring: Training very sparse deep networkscited by 139
  31. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135
  32. 2016Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruningcited by 134
  33. 2015Data-free parameter pruning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 112
  34. 2020Masking as an Efficient Alternative to Finetuning for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 93
  35. 2021Cross-domain Few-shot Learning with Task-specific Adapterscited by 80
  36. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  37. 2023Sensitivity-Aware Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 74
  38. 2022Visual Query Tuning: Towards Effective Usage of Intermediate Representations for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 57

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

10 papers.