mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Pre-trained Representation Classifiability can Boost its Interpretability

arXiv 2510.24105 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The visual representation of a pre-trained model prioritizes the classifiability on downstream tasks, while the widespread applications for pre-trained visual models have posed new requirements for representation interpretability. However, it remains unclear whether the pre-trained representations can achieve high interpretability and classifiability simultaneously. To answer this question, we quantify the representation interpretability by leveraging its correlation with the ratio of interpretable semantics within the representations. Given the pre-trained representations, only the interpretable semantics can be captured by interpretations, whereas the uninterpretable part leads to information loss. Based on this fact, we propose the Inherent Interpretability Score (IIS) that evaluates the information loss, measures the ratio of interpretable semantics, and quantifies the representation interpretability. In the evaluation of the representation interpretability with different classifiability, we surprisingly discover that the interpretability and classifiability are positively correlated, i.e., representations with higher classifiability provide more interpretable semantics that can be captured in the interpretations. This observation further supports two benefits to the pre-trained representations. First, the classifiability of representations can be further improved by fine-tuning with interpretability maximization. Second, with the classifiability improvement for the representations, we obtain predictions based on their interpretations with less accuracy degradation. The discovered positive correlation and corresponding applications show that practitioners can unify the improvements in interpretability and classifiability for pre-trained vision models. Codes are available at https://github.com/ssfgunner/IIS.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.

Builds on

43 of 62 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  8. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  9. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  10. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  12. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
31 more
  1. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  2. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  3. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  4. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
  5. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  6. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  7. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  8. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  9. 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
  10. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
  11. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 312
  12. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 293
  13. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 290
  14. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 285
  15. 2022UniFormer: Unifying Convolution and Self-attention for Visual Recognitioncited by 206
  16. 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
  17. 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 131
  18. 2022Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Modelscited by 116
  19. 2022UniFormerV2: Spatiotemporal Learning by Arming Image ViTs with Video UniFormercited by 116
  20. 2018Interpreting CNNs via Decision Treescited by 89
  21. 2023Learning Concise and Descriptive Attributes for Visual Recognitioncited by 73
  22. 2024VLG-CBM: Training Concept Bottleneck Models with Vision-Language Guidancecited by 65
  23. 2017Interpreting CNN Knowledge via an Explanatory Graphcited by 49
  24. 2022Overlooked factors in concept-based explanations: Dataset choice, concept learnability, and human capabilitycited by 46
  25. 2021A Framework for Learning Ante-hoc Explainable Models via Conceptscited by 45
  26. 2022Do Explanations Explain? Model Knows Bestcited by 20
  27. 2024DEAL: Disentangle and Localize Concept-level Explanations for VLMscited by 14
  28. 2024Neural Clustering based Visual Representation Learningcited by 12
  29. 2016Growing Interpretable Part Graphs on ConvNets via Multi-Shot Learningcited by 10
  30. 2024Expanding Sparse Tuning for Low Memory Usagecited by 10
  31. 2019Rectified Decision Trees: Towards Interpretability, Compression and Empirical Soundnesscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.