Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal foundation models offer a promising framework for robotic perception and planning by processing sensory inputs to generate actionable plans. However, addressing uncertainty in both perception (sensory interpretation) and decision-making (plan generation) remains a critical challenge for ensuring task reliability. We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate these two forms of uncertainty. We first introduce a framework for uncertainty disentanglement, isolating perception uncertainty arising from limitations in visual understanding and decision uncertainty relating to the robustness of generated plans. To quantify each type of uncertainty, we propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making: we use conformal prediction to calibrate perception uncertainty and introduce Formal-Methods-Driven Prediction (FMDP) to quantify decision uncertainty, leveraging formal verification techniques for theoretical guarantees. Building on this quantification, we implement two targeted intervention mechanisms: an active sensing process that dynamically re-observes high-uncertainty scenes to enhance visual input quality and an automated refinement procedure that fine-tunes the model on high-certainty data, improving its capability to meet task specifications. Empirical validation in real-world and simulated robotic tasks demonstrates that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines. These improvements are attributed to the combined effect of both interventions and highlight the importance of uncertainty disentanglement, which facilitates targeted interventions that enhance the robustness and reliability of autonomous systems. Fine-tuned models, code, and datasets are available at https://uncertainty-in-planning.github.io/.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2024.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
12 more
- 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 439
- 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 435
- 2023ConceptGraphs: Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Perception and Planningcited by 357
- 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
- 2023EmbodiedGPT: Vision-Language Pre-Training via Embodied Chain of Thoughtcited by 276
- 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
- 2023Embodied Task Planning with Large Language Modelscited by 84
- 2018A Survey on Semantic Parsingcited by 62
- 2024On The Planning Abilities of OpenAI's o1 Models: Feasibility, Optimality, and Generalizabilitycited by 18
- 2022Automaton-Based Representations of Task Knowledge from Generative Language Modelscited by 12
- 2023Multimodal Pretrained Models for Verifiable Sequential Decision-Making: Planning, Grounding, and Perceptioncited by 8
- 2023Interactively Robot Action Planning with Uncertainty Analysis and Active Questioning by Large Language Modelcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 4.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directionscited by 49
- 2025VISO-Grasp: Vision-Language Informed Spatial Object-centric 6-DoF Active View Planning and Grasping in Clutter and Invisibilitycited by 11
- 2025VLN-Zero: Rapid Exploration and Cache-Enabled Neurosymbolic Vision-Language Planning for Zero-Shot Transfer in Robot Navigationcited by 8
- 2026AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraintscited by 6
- 2026ReconVLA: An Uncertainty-Guided and Failure-Aware Vision-Language-Action Framework for Robotic Controlcited by 5
- 2025Real-Time Privacy Preservation for Robot Visual Perceptioncited by 2
- 2026VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agentscited by 2
- 2025Human Centric General Physical Intelligence for Agile Manufacturing Automationcited by 1
- 2025Drones that Think on their Feet: Sudden Landing Decisions with Embodied AIcited by 1
- 2025UNCAP: Uncertainty-Guided Neurosymbolic Planning Using Natural Language Communication for Cooperative Autonomous Vehiclescited by 1
- 2025RepV: Safety-Separable Latent Spaces for Scalable Neurosymbolic Plan Verificationcited by 1
- 2025Foundation Models for Logistics: Toward Certifiable, Conversational Planning Interfacescited by 0
1 more
- 2026Co-GLANCE: Uncertainty-Aware Active Perception for Heterogeneous Robot Teaming7 Jun 2026
- 2026AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraints4 Jun 2026
- 2026VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents3 Jun 2026
- 2026ReconVLA: An Uncertainty-Guided and Failure-Aware Vision-Language-Action Framework for Robotic Control17 Apr 2026
- 2025RepV: Safety-Separable Latent Spaces for Scalable Neurosymbolic Plan Verification30 Oct 2025
- 2025UNCAP: Uncertainty-Guided Neurosymbolic Planning Using Natural Language Communication for Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles14 Oct 2025
- 2025Drones that Think on their Feet: Sudden Landing Decisions with Embodied AI30 Sep 2025
- 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directions23 Sep 2025
- 2025VLN-Zero: Rapid Exploration and Cache-Enabled Neurosymbolic Vision-Language Planning for Zero-Shot Transfer in Robot Navigation23 Sep 2025
- 2025Human Centric General Physical Intelligence for Agile Manufacturing Automation16 Aug 2025
- 2025Foundation Models for Logistics: Toward Certifiable, Conversational Planning Interfaces15 Jul 2025
- 2025Real-Time Privacy Preservation for Robot Visual Perception8 May 2025
- 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directionscited by 49
- 2026AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraintscited by 6
- 2026VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agentscited by 2
- 2026AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraints4 Jun 2026
- 2026VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents3 Jun 2026
- 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directions23 Sep 2025
- 2025VISO-Grasp: Vision-Language Informed Spatial Object-centric 6-DoF Active View Planning and Grasping in Clutter and Invisibilitycited by 11
- 2025VLN-Zero: Rapid Exploration and Cache-Enabled Neurosymbolic Vision-Language Planning for Zero-Shot Transfer in Robot Navigationcited by 8
- 2025Real-Time Privacy Preservation for Robot Visual Perceptioncited by 2
- 2025RepV: Safety-Separable Latent Spaces for Scalable Neurosymbolic Plan Verificationcited by 1
- 2025Foundation Models for Logistics: Toward Certifiable, Conversational Planning Interfacescited by 0
- 2025RepV: Safety-Separable Latent Spaces for Scalable Neurosymbolic Plan Verification30 Oct 2025
- 2025VLN-Zero: Rapid Exploration and Cache-Enabled Neurosymbolic Vision-Language Planning for Zero-Shot Transfer in Robot Navigation23 Sep 2025
- 2025Foundation Models for Logistics: Toward Certifiable, Conversational Planning Interfaces15 Jul 2025
- 2025Real-Time Privacy Preservation for Robot Visual Perception8 May 2025
- 2025VISO-Grasp: Vision-Language Informed Spatial Object-centric 6-DoF Active View Planning and Grasping in Clutter and Invisibility16 Mar 2025