Real-Time Privacy Preservation for Robot Visual Perception
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many robots (e.g., iRobot's Roomba) operate based on visual observations from live video streams, and such observations may inadvertently include privacy-sensitive objects, such as personal identifiers. Existing approaches for preserving privacy rely on deep learning models, differential privacy, or cryptography. They lack guarantees for the complete concealment of all sensitive objects. Guaranteeing concealment requires post-processing techniques and thus is inadequate for real-time video streams. We develop a method for privacy-constrained video streaming, PCVS, that conceals sensitive objects within real-time video streams. PCVS takes a logical specification constraining the existence of privacy-sensitive objects, e.g., never show faces when a person exists. It uses a detection model to evaluate the existence of these objects in each incoming frame. Then, it blurs out a subset of objects such that the existence of the remaining objects satisfies the specification. We then propose a conformal prediction approach to (i) establish a theoretical lower bound on the probability of the existence of these objects in a sequence of frames satisfying the specification and (ii) update the bound with the arrival of each subsequent frame. Quantitative evaluations show that PCVS achieves over 95 percent specification satisfaction rate in multiple datasets, significantly outperforming other methods. The satisfaction rate is consistently above the theoretical bounds across all datasets, indicating that the established bounds hold. Additionally, we deploy PCVS on robots in real-time operation and show that the robots operate normally without being compromised when PCVS conceals objects.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
References · 18
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
- 2017Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metriccited by 910
- 2016Simple Online and Realtime Trackingcited by 868
- 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 503
- 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
- 2018A Robust Real-Time Automatic License Plate Recognition Based on the YOLO Detectorcited by 56
- 2022GEMEL: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edgecited by 32
- 2019REVAMP2T: Real-time Edge Video Analytics for Multi-camera Privacy-aware Pedestrian Trackingcited by 14
- 2024Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Frameworkcited by 13
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models Using Formal Methods Feedbackcited by 12
6 more
- 2023Specification-Driven Video Search via Foundation Models and Formal Verificationcited by 10
- 2025We'll Fix it in Post: Improving Text-to-Video Generation with Neuro-Symbolic Feedbackcited by 10
- 2024Neuro-Symbolic Evaluation of Text-to-Video Models using Formal Verificationcited by 9
- 2021Privid: Practical, Privacy-Preserving Video Analytics Queriescited by 7
- 2020Zooming Into Video Conferencing Privacy and Security Threatscited by 5
- 2020Minor Privacy Protection Through Real-time Video Processing at the Edgecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025A Challenge to Build Neuro-Symbolic Video Agentscited by 5
- 2026Position: Embodied AI Requires a Privacy-Utility Trade-offcited by 1
- 2026Position: Embodied AI Requires a Privacy-Utility Trade-off6 May 2026
- 2025A Challenge to Build Neuro-Symbolic Video Agents20 May 2025