RepV: Safety-Separable Latent Spaces for Scalable Neurosymbolic Plan Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI systems migrate to safety-critical domains, verifying that their actions comply with well-defined rules remains a challenge. Formal methods provide provable guarantees but demand hand-crafted temporal-logic specifications, offering limited expressiveness and accessibility. Deep learning approaches enable evaluation of plans against natural-language constraints, yet their opaque decision process invites misclassifications with potentially severe consequences. We introduce RepV, a neurosymbolic verifier that unifies both views by learning a latent space where safe and unsafe plans are linearly separable. Starting from a modest seed set of plans labeled by an off-the-shelf model checker, RepV trains a lightweight projector that embeds each plan, together with a language model-generated rationale, into a low-dimensional space; a frozen linear boundary then verifies compliance for unseen natural-language rules in a single forward pass. Beyond binary classification, RepV provides a probabilistic guarantee on the likelihood of correct verification based on its position in the latent space. This guarantee enables a guarantee-driven refinement of the planner, improving rule compliance without human annotations. Empirical evaluations show that RepV improves compliance prediction accuracy by up to 15% compared to baseline methods while adding fewer than 0.2M parameters. Furthermore, our refinement framework outperforms ordinary fine-tuning baselines across various planning domains. These results show that safety-separable latent spaces offer a scalable, plug-and-play primitive for reliable neurosymbolic plan verification. Code and data are available at: https://repv-project.github.io/.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2024Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Modelscited by 308
- 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 244
- 2024Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 115
- 2025SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Freecited by 68
- 2024Formal-LLM: Integrating Formal Language and Natural Language for Controllable LLM-based Agentscited by 40
- 2025VeriPlan: Integrating Formal Verification and LLMs into End-User Planningcited by 20
- 2024Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoningcited by 19
- 2024Vehicle: Bridging the Embedding Gap in the Verification of Neuro-Symbolic Programscited by 14
- 2024Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Frameworkcited by 13
- 2022Automaton-Based Representations of Task Knowledge from Generative Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025Towards Reliable Code-as-Policies: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Embodied Task Planningcited by 11
8 more
- 2024Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Preemptive Detection and Steering of LLM Misalignment via Latent Reachabilitycited by 10
- 2021The Challenges and Opportunities of Human-Centered AI for Trustworthy Robots and Autonomous Systemscited by 8
- 2025VLN-Zero: Rapid Exploration and Cache-Enabled Neurosymbolic Vision-Language Planning for Zero-Shot Transfer in Robot Navigationcited by 8
- 2023Neuro-Symbolic AI for Compliance Checking of Electrical Control Panelscited by 6
- 2024Joint Verification and Refinement of Language Models for Safety-Constrained Planningcited by 6
- 2024Reasoning, Memorization, and Fine-Tuning Language Models for Non-Cooperative Gamescited by 3
- 2025UNCAP: Uncertainty-Guided Neurosymbolic Planning Using Natural Language Communication for Cooperative Autonomous Vehiclescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.