mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Hidden Subgoals under Temporal Ordering Constraints in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2411.01425 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

In real-world applications, the success of completing a task is often determined by multiple key steps which are distant in time steps and have to be achieved in a fixed time order. For example, the key steps listed on the cooking recipe should be achieved one-by-one in the right time order. These key steps can be regarded as subgoals of the task and their time orderings are described as temporal ordering constraints. However, in many real-world problems, subgoals or key states are often hidden in the state space and their temporal ordering constraints are also unknown, which make it challenging for previous RL algorithms to solve this kind of tasks. In order to address this issue, in this work we propose a novel RL algorithm for bf learning hidden bf subgoals under bf temporal bf ordering bf constraints (LSTOC). We propose a new contrastive learning objective which can effectively learn hidden subgoals (key states) and their temporal orderings at the same time, based on first-occupancy representation and temporal geometric sampling. In addition, we propose a sample-efficient learning strategy to discover subgoals one-by-one following their temporal order constraints by building a subgoal tree to represent discovered subgoals and their temporal ordering relationships. Specifically, this tree can be used to improve the sample efficiency of trajectory collection, fasten the task solving and generalize to unseen tasks. The LSTOC framework is evaluated on several environments with image-based observations, showing its significant improvement over baseline methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2024.

Builds on

16 of 24 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  4. 2019Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 219
  5. 2021Benchmarking the Spectrum of Agent Capabilitiescited by 200
  6. 2019Reinforcement Learning for Temporal Logic Control Synthesis with Probabilistic Satisfaction Guaranteescited by 77
  7. 2019Control Synthesis from Linear Temporal Logic Specifications using Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  8. 2018Foundations for Restraining Bolts: Reinforcement Learning with LTLf/LDLf restraining specificationscited by 72
  9. 2017Environment-Independent Task Specifications via GLTLcited by 67
  10. 2022Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 61
  11. 2020Active Finite Reward Automaton Inference and Reinforcement Learning Using Queries and Counterexamplescited by 23
  12. 2021A First-Occupancy Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
4 more
  1. 2022Noisy Symbolic Abstractions for Deep RL: A case study with Reward Machinescited by 10
  2. 2023Learning Rational Subgoals from Demonstrations and Instructionscited by 5
  3. 2023Reinforcement Learning of Action and Query Policies with LTL Instructions under Uncertain Event Detectorcited by 5
  4. 2022Contrastive Retrospection: honing in on critical steps for rapid learning and generalization in RLcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025One Subgoal at a Time: Zero-Shot Generalization to Arbitrary Linear Temporal Logic Requirements in Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025TW-CRL: Time-Weighted Contrastive Reward Learning for Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Three Steps at a Time: Learning Representations from Action Sequences in Contrastive RL
  4. 2024Learning Temporal Distances: Contrastive Successor Features Can Provide a Metric Structure for Decision-Making
  5. 2025Contrastive Representations for Temporal Reasoning
  6. 2024Subgoal Discovery Using a Free Energy Paradigm and State Aggregations
  7. 2026Hierarchical Entity-centric Reinforcement Learning with Factored Subgoal Diffusion
  8. 2026Learning Multiple Timescales for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning