Disentangling Interactions and Dependencies in Feature Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In explainable machine learning, global feature importance methods try to determine how much each individual feature contributes to predicting the target variable, resulting in one importance score for each feature. But often, predicting the target variable requires interactions between several features (such as in the XOR function), and features might have complex statistical dependencies that allow to partially replace one feature with another one. In commonly used feature importance scores these cooperative effects are conflated with the features' individual contributions, making them prone to misinterpretations. In this work, we derive DIP, a new mathematical decomposition of individual feature importance scores that disentangles three components: the standalone contribution and the contributions stemming from interactions and dependencies. We prove that the DIP decomposition is unique and show how it can be estimated in practice. Based on these results, we propose a new visualization of feature importance scores that clearly illustrates the different contributions.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2024.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
- 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
- 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 87
- 2022From Shapley Values to Generalized Additive Models and backcited by 60
- 2023SHAP-IQ: Unified Approximation of any-order Shapley Interactionscited by 51
- 2019Purifying Interaction Effects with the Functional ANOVA: An Efficient Algorithm for Recovering Identifiable Additive Modelscited by 42
- 2024Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree Ensemblescited by 31
8 more
- 2024KernelSHAP-IQ: Weighted Least-Square Optimization for Shapley Interactionscited by 22
- 2022Scientific Inference With Interpretable Machine Learning: Analyzing Models to Learn About Real-World Phenomenacited by 21
- 2022Unifying local and global model explanations by functional decomposition of low dimensional structurescited by 18
- 2019A Novel Approach to the Partial Information Decompositioncited by 17
- 2023Decomposing Global Feature Effects Based on Feature Interactionscited by 17
- 2014Exploration of synergistic and redundant information sharing in static and dynamical Gaussian systemscited by 16
- 2020Relative Feature Importancecited by 12
- 2022Statistical Aspects of SHAP: Functional ANOVA for Model Interpretationcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Train Once, Answer All: Many Pretraining Experiments for the Cost of Onecited by 6
- 2024Assessing high-order effects in feature importance via predictability decompositioncited by 2
- 2025Feature Attribution from First Principlescited by 1
- 2025Decorrelated feature importance from local sample weightingcited by 1
- 2025Train Once, Answer All: Many Pretraining Experiments for the Cost of One27 Sep 2025
- 2025Decorrelated feature importance from local sample weighting8 Aug 2025
- 2025Feature Attribution from First Principles30 May 2025
- 2024Assessing high-order effects in feature importance via predictability decomposition13 Dec 2024