Feature Attribution from First Principles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature attribution methods are a popular approach to explain the behavior of machine learning models. They assign importance scores to each input feature, quantifying their influence on the model's prediction. However, evaluating these methods empirically remains a significant challenge. To bypass this shortcoming, several prior works have proposed axiomatic frameworks that any feature attribution method should satisfy. In this work, we argue that such axioms are often too restrictive, and propose in response a new feature attribution framework, built from the ground up. Rather than imposing axioms, we start by defining attributions for the simplest possible models, i.e., indicator functions, and use these as building blocks for more complex models. We then show that one recovers several existing attribution methods, depending on the choice of atomic attribution. Subsequently, we derive closed-form expressions for attribution of deep ReLU networks, and take a step toward the optimization of evaluation metrics with respect to feature attributions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 126
15 more
- 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
- 2022A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methodscited by 102
- 2022Impossibility Theorems for Feature Attributioncited by 78
- 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
- 2021Fast Axiomatic Attribution for Neural Networkscited by 35
- 2023SplineCam: Exact Visualization and Characterization of Deep Network Geometry and Decision Boundariescited by 31
- 2023Feature Importance: A Closer Look at Shapley Values and LOCOcited by 23
- 2024Mathematical theory of deep learningcited by 23
- 2021What does LIME really see in images?cited by 21
- 2022Attribution-based Explanations that Provide Recourse Cannot be Robustcited by 20
- 2024Attention Meets Post-hoc Interpretability: A Mathematical Perspectivecited by 11
- 2022New Definitions and Evaluations for Saliency Methods: Staying Intrinsic, Complete and Soundcited by 10
- 2024A Theory of Interpretable Approximationscited by 7
- 2024Disentangling Interactions and Dependencies in Feature Attributioncited by 4
- 2025How to safely discard features based on aggregate SHAP valuescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.