mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Statistical Aspects of SHAP: Functional ANOVA for Model Interpretation

arXiv 2208.09970 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2022stat.ME stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

SHAP is a popular method for measuring variable importance in machine learning models. In this paper, we study the algorithm used to estimate SHAP scores and outline its connection to the functional ANOVA decomposition. We use this connection to show that challenges in SHAP approximations largely relate to the choice of a feature distribution and the number of 2p ANOVA terms estimated. We argue that the connection between machine learning explainability and sensitivity analysis is illuminating in this case, but the immediate practical consequences are not obvious since the two fields face a different set of constraints. Machine learning explainability concerns models which are inexpensive to evaluate but often have hundreds, if not thousands, of features. Sensitivity analysis typically deals with models from physics or engineering which may be very time consuming to run, but operate on a comparatively small space of inputs.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2022.

Builds on

16 of 46 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  6. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  7. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  8. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
  9. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
  10. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
  11. 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 154
  12. 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
4 more
  1. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  2. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  3. 2020Shapley Flow: A Graph-based Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 51
  4. 2022Unifying local and global model explanations by functional decomposition of low dimensional structurescited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

12 papers.