mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Testing GPT-4-o1-preview on math and science problems: A follow-up study

arXiv 2410.22340 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2024cs.CY cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In August 2023, Scott Aaronson and I reported the results of testing GPT4 with the Wolfram Alpha and Code Interpreter plug-ins over a collection of 105 original high-school level and college-level science and math problems (Davis and Aaronson, 2023). In September 2024, I tested the recently released model GPT-4o1-preview on the same collection. Overall I found that performance had significantly improved, but was still considerably short of perfect. In particular, problems that involve spatial reasoning are often stumbling blocks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?
  2. 2023Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verification
  3. 2025Benchmarking Large Language Models for Calculus Problem-Solving: A Comparative Analysis
  4. 2024An Eye for an AI: Evaluating GPT-4o's Visual Perception Skills and Geometric Reasoning Skills Using Computer Graphics Questions
  5. 2024Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Vision on Brazil's National Undergraduate Computer Science Exam
  6. 2023Investigating the Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Mathematical Reasoning and Problem Solving: Evidence from the Vietnamese National High School Graduation Examination
  7. 2024OpenAI-o1 AB Testing: Does the o1 model really do good reasoning in math problem solving?
  8. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT