mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Vision on Brazil's National Undergraduate Computer Science Exam

arXiv 2406.09671 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent integration of visual capabilities into Large Language Models (LLMs) has the potential to play a pivotal role in science and technology education, where visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and tables are commonly used to improve the learning experience. This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT-4 Vision, OpenAI's most advanced visual model at the time the study was conducted, on the Bachelor in Computer Science section of Brazil's 2021 National Undergraduate Exam (ENADE). By presenting the model with the exam's open and multiple-choice questions in their original image format and allowing for reassessment in response to differing answer keys, we were able to evaluate the model's reasoning and self-reflecting capabilities in a large-scale academic assessment involving textual and visual content. ChatGPT-4 Vision significantly outperformed the average exam participant, positioning itself within the top 10 best score percentile. While it excelled in questions that incorporated visual elements, it also encountered challenges with question interpretation, logical reasoning, and visual acuity. The involvement of an independent expert panel to review cases of disagreement between the model and the answer key revealed some poorly constructed questions containing vague or ambiguous statements, calling attention to the critical need for improved question design in future exams. Our findings suggest that while ChatGPT-4 Vision shows promise in multimodal academic evaluations, human oversight remains crucial for verifying the model's accuracy and ensuring the fairness of high-stakes educational exams. The paper's research materials are publicly available at https://github.com/nabormendonca/gpt-4v-enade-cs-2021.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

2 of 7 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or BARD? Evaluating LLMs Reasoning Ability in Zero-Shot Setting and Performance Boosting Through Promptscited by 34
  2. 2023Performance of ChatGPT on the US Fundamentals of Engineering Exam: Comprehensive Assessment of Proficiency and Potential Implications for Professional Environmental Engineering Practicecited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Evaluating GPT-4's Vision Capabilities on Brazilian University Admission Exams
  2. 2023Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 Models on Brazilian University Admission Exams
  3. 2024An Eye for an AI: Evaluating GPT-4o's Visual Perception Skills and Geometric Reasoning Skills Using Computer Graphics Questions
  4. 2024EXAMS-V: A Multi-Discipline Multilingual Multimodal Exam Benchmark for Evaluating Vision Language Models
  5. 2025Performance of GPT-5 Frontier Models in Ophthalmology Question Answering
  6. 2024Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiency
  7. 2024Realizing Visual Question Answering for Education: GPT-4V as a Multimodal AI
  8. 2025ChatGPT and Gemini participated in the Korean College Scholastic Ability Test -- Earth Science I