Effective Guidance for Model Attention with Simple Yes-no Annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern deep learning models often make predictions by focusing on irrelevant areas, leading to biased performance and limited generalization. Existing methods aimed at rectifying model attention require explicit labels for irrelevant areas or complex pixel-wise ground truth attention maps. We present CRAYON (Correcting Reasoning with Annotations of Yes Or No), offering effective, scalable, and practical solutions to rectify model attention using simple yes-no annotations. CRAYON empowers classical and modern model interpretation techniques to identify and guide model reasoning: CRAYON-ATTENTION directs classic interpretations based on saliency maps to focus on relevant image regions, while CRAYON-PRUNING removes irrelevant neurons identified by modern concept-based methods to mitigate their influence. Through extensive experiments with both quantitative and human evaluation, we showcase CRAYON's effectiveness, scalability, and practicality in refining model attention. CRAYON achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming 12 methods across 3 benchmark datasets, surpassing approaches that require more complex annotations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
46 of 62 references.
References · 46
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
34 more
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
- 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 172
- 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 145
- 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 142
- 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
- 2021Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning?cited by 114
- 2020Right for the Right Concept: Revising Neuro-Symbolic Concepts by Interacting with their Explanationscited by 94
- 2019Summit: Scaling Deep Learning Interpretability by Visualizing Activation and Attribution Summarizationscited by 72
- 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70
- 2022MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explorecited by 66
- 2022Fairness-aware Adversarial Perturbation Towards Bias Mitigation for Deployed Deep Modelscited by 47
- 2020Empirical observation of negligible fairness-accuracy trade-offs in machine learning for public policycited by 44
- 2021Finding and Fixing Spurious Patterns with Explanationscited by 38
- 2021CausalAdv: Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Causalitycited by 37
- 2022UMIX: Improving Importance Weighting for Subpopulation Shift via Uncertainty-Aware Mixupcited by 34
- 2022Avoiding spurious correlations via logit correctioncited by 32
- 2022Aligning Eyes between Humans and Deep Neural Network through Interactive Attention Alignmentcited by 27
- 2021UDIS: Unsupervised Discovery of Bias in Deep Visual Recognition Modelscited by 23
- 2022RES: A Robust Framework for Guiding Visual Explanationcited by 22
- 2022Eye-gaze-guided Vision Transformer for Rectifying Shortcut Learningcited by 20
- 2022On the Limitations of Dataset Balancing: The Lost Battle Against Spurious Correlationscited by 19
- 2023FLAC: Fairness-Aware Representation Learning by Suppressing Attribute-Class Associationscited by 18
- 2023Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanationscited by 16
- 2021Saliency Guided Experience Packing for Replay in Continual Learningcited by 15
- 2022Information-Theoretic Bias Reduction via Causal View of Spurious Correlationcited by 15
- 2020Reflective-Net: Learning from Explanationscited by 13
- 2019GradMask: Reduce Overfitting by Regularizing Saliencycited by 12
- 2022Better May Not Be Fairer: A Study on Subgroup Discrepancy in Image Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.