Mitigating Paraphrase Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors via Paraphrase Inversion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-quality paraphrases are easy to produce using instruction-tuned language models or specialized paraphrasing models. Although this capability has a variety of benign applications, paraphrasing attacksunicodex2013paraphrases applied to machine-generated textsunicodex2013are known to significantly degrade the performance of machine-text detectors. This motivates us to consider the novel problem of paraphrase inversion, where, given paraphrased text, the objective is to recover an approximation of the original text. The closer the approximation is to the original text, the better machine-text detectors will perform. We propose an approach which frames the problem as translation from paraphrased text back to the original text, which requires examples of texts and corresponding paraphrases to train the inversion model. Fortunately, such training data can easily be generated, given a corpus of original texts and one or more paraphrasing models. We find that language models such as GPT-4 and Llama-3 exhibit biases when paraphrasing which an inversion model can learn with a modest amount of data. Perhaps surprisingly, we also find that such models generalize well, including to paraphrase models unseen at training time. Finally, we show that when combined with a paraphrased-text detector, our inversion models provide an effective defense against paraphrasing attacks, and overall our approach yields an average improvement of +22% AUROC across seven machine-text detectors and three different domains.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
27 of 45 references.
References · 27
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
- 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
- 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
15 more
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
- 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 199
- 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 189
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
- 2020Reformulating Unsupervised Style Transfer as Paraphrase Generationcited by 181
- 2015Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networkscited by 168
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
- 2023Sentence Embedding Leaks More Information than You Expect: Generative Embedding Inversion Attack to Recover the Whole Sentencecited by 81
- 2024Forcing Diffuse Distributions out of Language Modelscited by 48
- 2024Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representationscited by 40
- 2024Extracting Prompts by Inverting LLM Outputscited by 40
- 2021A Deep Metric Learning Approach to Account Linkingcited by 24
- 2023Can Authorship Representation Learning Capture Stylistic Features?cited by 17
- 2021Understanding Invariance via Feedforward Inversion of Discriminatively Trained Classifierscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025M-DAIGT: A Shared Task on Multi-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Textcited by 2
- 2025Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors Retain Stylistic Fingerprintscited by 0
- 2026AEyeDE: An Attention-Based Attribution Framework for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Style Representation Learning for AI-Text Detection via Paraphrase Inversioncited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Style Representation Learning for AI-Text Detection via Paraphrase Inversion8 Jun 2026
- 2026AEyeDE: An Attention-Based Attribution Framework for AI-Generated Text Detection13 Apr 2026
- 2025M-DAIGT: A Shared Task on Multi-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Text14 Nov 2025
- 2025Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors Retain Stylistic Fingerprints20 May 2025