mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

M-DAIGT: A Shared Task on Multi-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Text

arXiv 2511.11340 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The generation of highly fluent text by Large Language Models (LLMs) poses a significant challenge to information integrity and academic research. In this paper, we introduce the Multi-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Text (M-DAIGT) shared task, which focuses on detecting AI-generated text across multiple domains, particularly in news articles and academic writing. M-DAIGT comprises two binary classification subtasks: News Article Detection (NAD) (Subtask 1) and Academic Writing Detection (AWD) (Subtask 2). To support this task, we developed and released a new large-scale benchmark dataset of 30,000 samples, balanced between human-written and AI-generated texts. The AI-generated content was produced using a variety of modern LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, Claude) and diverse prompting strategies. A total of 46 unique teams registered for the shared task, of which four teams submitted final results. All four teams participated in both Subtask 1 and Subtask 2. We describe the methods employed by these participating teams and briefly discuss future directions for M-DAIGT.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

Builds on

23 of 43 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  4. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  5. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  6. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  7. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  8. 2020ARBERT & MARBERT: Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Arabiccited by 164
  9. 2023Protecting Language Generation Models via Invisible Watermarkingcited by 81
  10. 2022RankGen: Improving Text Generation with Large Ranking Modelscited by 72
  11. 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?cited by 39
  12. 2025Feature-Level Insights into Artificial Text Detection with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 14
11 more
  1. 2025HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoringcited by 14
  2. 2020Enhancing Handwritten Text Recognition with N-gram sequence decomposition and Multitask Learningcited by 11
  3. 2023TextDefense: Adversarial Text Detection based on Word Importance Entropycited by 9
  4. 2025Iron Sharpens Iron: Defending Against Attacks in Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Trainingcited by 9
  5. 2025Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectorscited by 9
  6. 2024GPT-generated Text Detection: Benchmark Dataset and Tensor-based Detection Methodcited by 8
  7. 2024Detection of Human and Machine-Authored Fake News in Urducited by 7
  8. 2024Mitigating Paraphrase Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors via Paraphrase Inversioncited by 4
  9. 2024TrustAI at SemEval-2024 Task 8: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multi-domain Machine Generated Text Detection Techniquescited by 3
  10. 2025Who Writes What: Unveiling the Impact of Author Roles on AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  11. 2025Double Entendre: Robust Audio-Based AI-Generated Lyrics Detection via Multi-View Fusioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.