M-DAIGT: A Shared Task on Multi-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The generation of highly fluent text by Large Language Models (LLMs) poses a significant challenge to information integrity and academic research. In this paper, we introduce the Multi-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Text (M-DAIGT) shared task, which focuses on detecting AI-generated text across multiple domains, particularly in news articles and academic writing. M-DAIGT comprises two binary classification subtasks: News Article Detection (NAD) (Subtask 1) and Academic Writing Detection (AWD) (Subtask 2). To support this task, we developed and released a new large-scale benchmark dataset of 30,000 samples, balanced between human-written and AI-generated texts. The AI-generated content was produced using a variety of modern LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, Claude) and diverse prompting strategies. A total of 46 unique teams registered for the shared task, of which four teams submitted final results. All four teams participated in both Subtask 1 and Subtask 2. We describe the methods employed by these participating teams and briefly discuss future directions for M-DAIGT.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.
Builds on
23 of 43 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
- 2020ARBERT & MARBERT: Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Arabiccited by 164
- 2023Protecting Language Generation Models via Invisible Watermarkingcited by 81
- 2022RankGen: Improving Text Generation with Large Ranking Modelscited by 72
- 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?cited by 39
- 2025Feature-Level Insights into Artificial Text Detection with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 14
11 more
- 2025HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoringcited by 14
- 2020Enhancing Handwritten Text Recognition with N-gram sequence decomposition and Multitask Learningcited by 11
- 2023TextDefense: Adversarial Text Detection based on Word Importance Entropycited by 9
- 2025Iron Sharpens Iron: Defending Against Attacks in Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Trainingcited by 9
- 2025Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectorscited by 9
- 2024GPT-generated Text Detection: Benchmark Dataset and Tensor-based Detection Methodcited by 8
- 2024Detection of Human and Machine-Authored Fake News in Urducited by 7
- 2024Mitigating Paraphrase Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors via Paraphrase Inversioncited by 4
- 2024TrustAI at SemEval-2024 Task 8: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multi-domain Machine Generated Text Detection Techniquescited by 3
- 2025Who Writes What: Unveiling the Impact of Author Roles on AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 3
- 2025Double Entendre: Robust Audio-Based AI-Generated Lyrics Detection via Multi-View Fusioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.