mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Invariance via Feedforward Inversion of Discriminatively Trained Classifiers

arXiv 2103.07470 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A discriminatively trained neural net classifier can fit the training data perfectly if all information about its input other than class membership has been discarded prior to the output layer. Surprisingly, past research has discovered that some extraneous visual detail remains in the logit vector. This finding is based on inversion techniques that map deep embeddings back to images. We explore this phenomenon further using a novel synthesis of methods, yielding a feedforward inversion model that produces remarkably high fidelity reconstructions, qualitatively superior to those of past efforts. When applied to an adversarially robust classifier model, the reconstructions contain sufficient local detail and global structure that they might be confused with the original image in a quick glance, and the object category can clearly be gleaned from the reconstruction. Our approach is based on BigGAN (Brock, 2019), with conditioning on logits instead of one-hot class labels. We use our reconstruction model as a tool for exploring the nature of representations, including: the influence of model architecture and training objectives (specifically robust losses), the forms of invariance that networks achieve, representational differences between correctly and incorrectly classified images, and the effects of manipulating logits and images. We believe that our method can inspire future investigations into the nature of information flow in a neural net and can provide diagnostics for improving discriminative models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2021.

Builds on

29 of 35 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  9. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  10. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  11. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  12. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
17 more
  1. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  2. 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,295
  3. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
  4. 2016A Learned Representation For Artistic Stylecited by 340
  5. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  6. 2014Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embeddingcited by 287
  7. 2018cGANs with Projection Discriminatorcited by 253
  8. 2016Generating Images with Perceptual Similarity Metrics based on Deep Networkscited by 221
  9. 2015Inverting Visual Representations with Convolutional Networkscited by 168
  10. 2017Modulating early visual processing by languagecited by 167
  11. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  12. 2019Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extensioncited by 62
  13. 2020Semantic Pyramid for Image Generationcited by 34
  14. 2016Augmenting Supervised Neural Networks with Unsupervised Objectives for Large-scale Image Classificationcited by 18
  15. 2019Adversarial Robustness as a Prior for Learned Representationscited by 17
  16. 2018Inverting Supervised Representations with Autoregressive Neural Density Modelscited by 12
  17. 2020Making Sense of CNNs: Interpreting Deep Representations & Their Invariances with INNscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.