mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

UFT: Unifying Fine-Tuning of SFT and RLHF/DPO/UNA through a Generalized Implicit Reward Function

arXiv 2410.21438 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

By pretraining on trillions of tokens, an LLM gains the capability of text generation. However, to enhance its utility and reduce potential harm, SFT and alignment are applied sequentially to the pretrained model. Because SFT and alignment have different objectives and underlying processes, performance on certain tasks can decline. To address this, we seamlessly introduce Unified Fine-Tuning (UFT), which integrates SFT and alignment into a single training stage using the same objective and loss functions through an implicit reward function. Our experimental results demonstrate that UFT outperforms SFT on instruction-tuning data alone. Moreover, when combining instruction-tuning data with alignment data, UFT effectively prevents the degradation on some tasks across these two stages and shows a clear advantage over sequentially applying SFT and alignment. This is evident in the significant improvements observed in the ifeval task for instruction-following and the truthful task for factuality. The proposed general fine-tuning framework UFT establishes an effective and efficient paradigm for LLM post-training.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024PAFT: A Parallel Training Paradigm for Effective LLM Fine-Tuning25 Jun
  2. 2024Offline Regularised Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models Alignment29 May
  3. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  4. 2024sDPO: Don't Use Your Data All at Once28 Mar
  5. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  6. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive20 Feb
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  8. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 7

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  6. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  7. 2024HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward modelscited by 236

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  2. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
  3. 2025Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality
  4. 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning
  5. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
  7. 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
  8. 2025Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning