mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Info-CELS: Informative Saliency Map Guided Counterfactual Explanation

arXiv 2410.20539 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the demand for interpretable machine learning approaches continues to grow, there is an increasing necessity for human involvement in providing informative explanations for model decisions. This is necessary for building trust and transparency in AI-based systems, leading to the emergence of the Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) field. Recently, a novel counterfactual explanation model, CELS, has been introduced. CELS learns a saliency map for the interest of an instance and generates a counterfactual explanation guided by the learned saliency map. While CELS represents the first attempt to exploit learned saliency maps not only to provide intuitive explanations for the reason behind the decision made by the time series classifier but also to explore post hoc counterfactual explanations, it exhibits limitations in terms of high validity for the sake of ensuring high proximity and sparsity. In this paper, we present an enhanced approach that builds upon CELS. While the original model achieved promising results in terms of sparsity and proximity, it faced limitations in validity. Our proposed method addresses this limitation by removing mask normalization to provide more informative and valid counterfactual explanations. Through extensive experimentation on datasets from various domains, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms the CELS model, achieving higher validity and producing more informative explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  5. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  6. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  7. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  8. 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
  9. 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 421
  10. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 403
  11. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 399
  12. 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
11 more
  1. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  2. 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
  3. 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysiscited by 147
  4. 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
  5. 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
  6. 2020Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 64
  7. 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
  8. 2023Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Makingcited by 18
  9. 2022Motif-guided Time Series Counterfactual Explanationscited by 12
  10. 2022Shapelet-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 9
  11. 2024TX-Gen: Multi-Objective Optimization for Sparse Counterfactual Explanations for Time-Series Classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.