mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ODDN: Addressing Unpaired Data Challenges in Open-World Deepfake Detection on Online Social Networks

arXiv 2410.18687 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2024cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite significant advances in deepfake detection, handling varying image quality, especially due to different compressions on online social networks (OSNs), remains challenging. Current methods succeed by leveraging correlations between paired images, whether raw or compressed. However, in open-world scenarios, paired data is scarce, with compressed images readily available but corresponding raw versions difficult to obtain. This imbalance, where unpaired data vastly outnumbers paired data, often leads to reduced detection performance, as existing methods struggle without corresponding raw images. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel approach named the open-world deepfake detection network (ODDN), which comprises two core modules: open-world data aggregation (ODA) and compression-discard gradient correction (CGC). ODA effectively aggregates correlations between compressed and raw samples through both fine-grained and coarse-grained analyses for paired and unpaired data, respectively. CGC incorporates a compression-discard gradient correction to further enhance performance across diverse compression methods in OSN. This technique optimizes the training gradient to ensure the model remains insensitive to compression variations. Extensive experiments conducted on 17 popular deepfake datasets demonstrate the superiority of the ODDN over SOTA baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 40 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  3. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  4. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
  5. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
  6. 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
  7. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  8. 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
  9. 2021Multi-attentional Deepfake Detectioncited by 341
  10. 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
  11. 2022Self-supervised Learning of Adversarial Example: Towards Good Generalizations for Deepfake Detectioncited by 173
  12. 2019Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Imagescited by 139
9 more
  1. 2021Representative Forgery Mining for Fake Face Detectioncited by 108
  2. 2022Fusing Global and Local Features for Generalized AI-Synthesized Image Detectioncited by 88
  3. 2022FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-level Perturbationscited by 75
  4. 2021BiHPF: Bilateral High-Pass Filters for Robust Deepfake Detectioncited by 60
  5. 2021ADD: Frequency Attention and Multi-View based Knowledge Distillation to Detect Low-Quality Compressed Deepfake Imagescited by 48
  6. 2021Beyond the Spectrum: Detecting Deepfakes via Re-Synthesiscited by 44
  7. 2023BAGM: A Backdoor Attack for Manipulating Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 37
  8. 2023Quality-Agnostic Deepfake Detection with Intra-model Collaborative Learningcited by 32
  9. 2023Generating Robust Adversarial Examples against Online Social Networks (OSNs)cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

6 papers.