mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computing Optimal Regularizers for Online Linear Optimization

arXiv 2410.17336 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.DS cs.GTcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) algorithms are a popular class of learning algorithms for online linear optimization (OLO) that guarantee sub-linear regret, but the choice of regularizer can significantly impact dimension-dependent factors in the regret bound. We present an algorithm that takes as input convex and symmetric action sets and loss sets for a specific OLO instance, and outputs a regularizer such that running FTRL with this regularizer guarantees regret within a universal constant factor of the best possible regret bound. In particular, for any choice of (convex, symmetric) action set and loss set we prove that there exists an instantiation of FTRL which achieves regret within a constant factor of the best possible learning algorithm, strengthening the universality result of Srebro et al., 2011. Our algorithm requires preprocessing time and space exponential in the dimension d of the OLO instance, but can be run efficiently online assuming a membership and linear optimization oracle for the action and loss sets, respectively (and is fully polynomial time for the case of constant dimension d). We complement this with a lower bound showing that even deciding whether a given regularizer is α-strongly-convex with respect to a given norm is NP-hard.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 48 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  2. 2014Linear Coupling: An Ultimate Unification of Gradient and Mirror Descentcited by 58
  3. 2020Faster Game Solving via Predictive Blackwell Approachability: Connecting Regret Matching and Mirror Descentcited by 57
  4. 2020Efficiently Solving MDPs with Stochastic Mirror Descentcited by 53
  5. 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 52
  6. 2015A Faster Cutting Plane Method and its Implications for Combinatorial and Convex Optimizationcited by 50
  7. 2020Robust Sub-Gaussian Principal Component Analysis and Width-Independent Schatten Packingcited by 35
  8. 2022Mirror Descent with Relative Smoothness in Measure Spaces, with application to Sinkhorn and EMcited by 34
  9. 2016Distributed Online Optimization in Dynamic Environments Using Mirror Descentcited by 32
  10. 2017Efficient Convex Optimization with Membership Oraclescited by 23
  11. 2019Coarse Correlation in Extensive-Form Gamescited by 17
  12. 2018Online Learning: Sufficient Statistics and the Burkholder Methodcited by 14
9 more
  1. 2022Alternating Mirror Descent for Constrained Min-Max Gamescited by 13
  2. 2021A Unified Approach to Fair Online Learning via Blackwell Approachabilitycited by 12
  3. 2023Faster Recalibration of an Online Predictor via Approachabilitycited by 11
  4. 2020Distributed Mirror Descent for Online Composite Optimizationcited by 10
  5. 2022Online Resource Allocation under Horizon Uncertaintycited by 9
  6. 2021Joint Online Learning and Decision-making via Dual Mirror Descentcited by 8
  7. 2021Primal-Dual Stochastic Mirror Descent for MDPscited by 3
  8. 2023Revisiting Area Convexity: Faster Box-Simplex Games and Spectrahedral Generalizationscited by 3
  9. 2021Online metric allocationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.