Block-Norm Geometries for Online Mirror Descent with Sparse Losses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The performance of online mirror descent depends critically on the geometry induced by its mirror map, yet standard algorithms largely rely on two canonical choices: Euclidean and entropic geometry. We show that these two geometries can both be substantially suboptimal when loss gradients are sparse. We introduce a family of randomized block-norm mirror maps that interpolates between Euclidean and entropic geometries and adapts to intermediate sparsity structure. For several standard convex sets, including ℓp balls, ellipsoids, boxes, and Minkowski sums of norm balls, we prove polynomial-in-dimension improvements in regret bounds over the better of online projected gradient descent and exponentiated gradient. We further construct explicit online convex optimization instances for which these improvements are realized: on a simple polytope, an intermediate block geometry achieves a poly(d) separation in regret from both Euclidean and entropic geometries in dimension d, while on the probability simplex we obtain a separation of order Omega(√log d/loglog d). Finally, we study geometry selection when sparsity is unknown. We show that naively alternating between mirror maps can incur linear regret, even though either mirror map alone has sublinear regret, and give a Hedge meta-algorithm that competes with the best mirror map in a finite portfolio. For random block geometries, this yields regret within an O(√loglog d) factor of the best random uniform block norm chosen in hindsight.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
7 of 24 references.
References · 7
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 131
- 2016MetaGrad: Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 46
- 2018On the optimality of the Hedge algorithm in the stochastic regimecited by 32
- 2015Gains and Losses are Fundamentally Different in Regret Minimization: The Sparse Casecited by 9
- 2019Geometry, Computation, and Optimality in Stochastic Optimizationcited by 9
- 2024Computing Optimal Regularizers for Online Linear Optimizationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.