Fine-Tuning Large Language Models to Appropriately Abstain with Semantic Entropy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to hallucinate, whereby they generate plausible but inaccurate text. This phenomenon poses significant risks in critical applications, such as medicine or law, necessitating robust hallucination mitigation strategies. While recent works have proposed fine-tuning methods to teach LLMs to abstain from answering questions beyond their knowledge or capabilities, these methods rely on the existence of ground-truth labels or are limited to short-form responses. To address these limitations, we propose fine-tuning using semantic entropy, an uncertainty measure derived from introspection into the model which does not require external labels. We demonstrate that our approach matches or outperforms models fine-tuned using prior work and achieves strong performance for both short and long-form generations on a range of datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
References · 27
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 692
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
15 more
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 269
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 259
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
- 2024Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 180
- 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 131
- 2024Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Modelscited by 121
- 2023R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'cited by 111
- 2024The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Modelscited by 105
- 2024Uncertainty Estimation and Quantification for LLMs: A Simple Supervised Approachcited by 76
- 2023Alignment for Honestycited by 74
- 2024Can AI Assistants Know What They Don't Know?cited by 50
- 2022RHO (ρ): Reducing Hallucination in Open-domain Dialogues with Knowledge Groundingcited by 47
- 2024Distinguishing the Knowable from the Unknowable with Language Modelscited by 47
- 2024Hallucination Detection in Foundation Models for Decision-Making: A Flexible Definition and Review of the State of the Artcited by 17
- 2024Laboratory-Scale AI: Open-Weight Models are Competitive with ChatGPT Even in Low-Resource Settingscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 6.
11 papers.
- 2025Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the Answercited by 27
- 2026Causal Evidence that Language Models use Confidence to Drive Behaviorcited by 10
- 2026Entropy Alone is Insufficient for Safe Selective Prediction in LLMscited by 7
- 2025HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axescited by 6
- 2026I-CALM: Incentivizing Confidence-Aware Abstention for LLM Selective Answeringcited by 5
- 2025Annotation-Efficient Universal Honesty Alignmentcited by 3
- 2025Know Or Not: a library for evaluating out-of-knowledge base robustnesscited by 2
- 2025Noise Augmented Fine Tuning for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Entropy-Based Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Inducing Epistemological Humility in Large Language Models: A Targeted SFT Approach to Reducing Hallucinationcited by 0
- 2026Readout Stability in Prefill-Only Decision Models:Zero-Label Prediction and Inference-Time Compute Allocationcited by 0
- 2026Readout Stability in Prefill-Only Decision Models:Zero-Label Prediction and Inference-Time Compute Allocation6 Oct 2026
- 2026I-CALM: Incentivizing Confidence-Aware Abstention for LLM Selective Answering5 Apr 2026
- 2026Causal Evidence that Language Models use Confidence to Drive Behavior23 Mar 2026
- 2026Entropy Alone is Insufficient for Safe Selective Prediction in LLMs22 Mar 2026
- 2026Inducing Epistemological Humility in Large Language Models: A Targeted SFT Approach to Reducing Hallucination18 Mar 2026
- 2026Entropy-Based Data Selection for Language Models19 Feb 2026
- 2025HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axes28 Oct 2025
- 2025Annotation-Efficient Universal Honesty Alignment20 Oct 2025
- 2025Know Or Not: a library for evaluating out-of-knowledge base robustness19 May 2025
- 2025Noise Augmented Fine Tuning for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models4 Apr 2025
- 2025Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the Answer18 Feb 2025