Inducing Epistemological Humility in Large Language Models: A Targeted SFT Approach to Reducing Hallucination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate, producing fluent but false information, partly because supervised fine-tuning (SFT) implicitly rewards always responding. We introduce textitHypoTermInstruct, an SFT dataset (31,487 responses for 11,151 questions) designed to teach models epistemological humility-the ability to recognize the limits of their own knowledge and admit uncertainty. This is achieved through questions about non-existent "hypothetical" terms. We also release textitHypoTermQA-Enhanced, a benchmark for hallucination tendency strengthened through multiple validations. We conducted 800 controlled LoRA SFT runs across textitLlama3.1-8B and textitGemma3-4B (base and instruct), testing 100 fine-tuning configurations with paired controls. Our results demonstrate that replacing generic instruction data with textitHypoTermInstruct significantly improves the HypoTerm Score (median increases of 0.19% to 25.91%) and FactScore (+0.39% to +0.86%), while maintaining stable performance on MMLU (minimal decreases of 0.26% to 0.35%). Our work demonstrates that targeted, high-quality SFT data teaching meta-cognitive skills can effectively reduce hallucination without preference/RL pipelines, providing mechanistic insights and a practical path toward more reliable AI systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 388
12 more
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
- 2024Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Modelscited by 116
- 2023The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuningcited by 106
- 2024LoRA vs Full Fine-tuning: An Illusion of Equivalencecited by 102
- 2023CoEdIT: Text Editing by Task-Specific Instruction Tuningcited by 67
- 2025AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommonscited by 31
- 2023MUFFIN: Curating Multi-Faceted Instructions for Improving Instruction-Followingcited by 30
- 2024Know When To Stop: A Study of Semantic Drift in Text Generationcited by 18
- 2024Know the Unknown: An Uncertainty-Sensitive Method for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 16
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Language Models to Appropriately Abstain with Semantic Entropycited by 9
- 2024HypoTermQA: Hypothetical Terms Dataset for Benchmarking Hallucination Tendency of LLMscited by 6
- 2025Balancing Truthfulness and Informativeness with Uncertainty-Aware Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.