How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many domains now employ AI-based decision-making aids, and although the potential for AI systems to assist with decision making is much discussed, human-AI collaboration often underperforms due to factors such as (mis)trust in the AI system and beliefs about AI being incapable of completing subjective tasks. One potential tool for influencing human decision making is performance pressure, which hasn't been much studied in interaction with human-AI decision making. In this work, we examine how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior. Using an inherently low-stakes task (spam review classification), we demonstrate effective and simple methods to apply pressure and influence human AI advice-taking behavior by manipulating financial incentives and imposing time limits. Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior. We conclude by discussing the implications of these interactions, strategies to effectively use pressure, and encourage future research to incorporate pressure analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.
Builds on
16 of 81 references.
References · 16
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2023Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanationscited by 80
- 2020Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 59
- 2024A Decision Theoretic Framework for Measuring AI Reliancecited by 26
- 2023The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 21
- 2024Investigating Mysteries of CoT-Augmented Distillationcited by 15
- 2022Trust and Reliance in XAI -- Distinguishing Between Attitudinal and Behavioral Measurescited by 10
- 2024GenAudit: Fixing Factual Errors in Language Model Outputs with Evidencecited by 10
- 2021Explainable AI and Adoption of Financial Algorithmic Advisors: an Experimental Studycited by 7
4 more
- 2022Taking Advice from (Dis)Similar Machines: The Impact of Human-Machine Similarity on Machine-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 6
- 2023USB: A Unified Summarization Benchmark Across Tasks and Domainscited by 5
- 2020LIMEADE: From AI Explanations to Advice Takingcited by 3
- 2024Risks and NLP Design: A Case Study on Procedural Document QAcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.