mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Mutually Boosting Implicit and Explicit Reasoning

arXiv 2605.31378 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) still struggle with fine-grained translation quality estimation (QE), even with long reasoning chains. We argue that LRMs already possess strong multilingual capabilities, while the core challenge stems from the intrinsic difficulty of learning the fine-grained QE task. In this paper, we propose RIEQE (Reasoning both Implicitly and Explicitly for QE), a simple two-stage training framework that enables the mutually boosting of implicit (layer-wise) and explicit (token-wise) reasoning capabilities. To make implicit reasoning feasible, we first decompose the complex QE task into straightforward subtasks. Based on this, our two-stage approach applies: (1) textitNonThinking-SFT, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) without reasoning chains to directly boost the model's implicit reasoning tendency and capability; and (2) textitThinking-RLVR, standard Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) to subsequently strengthen explicit reasoning. On the WMT test sets, RIEQE based on Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 surpasses all baselines in explicit reasoning performance, while its implicit reasoning capability is also comparable to the best current encoder-based models. We further provide evidence for the mutually boosting between implicit and explicit reasoning, showing how they benefit each other in a bidirectional manner. Our code is available at https://github.com/NJUNLP/RIEQE.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May

Other references · 7

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  3. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  4. 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 388
  5. 2026Rethinking Generalization in Reasoning SFT: A Conditional Analysis on Optimization, Data, and Model Capabilitycited by 11
  6. 2026Fairness or Fluency? An Investigation into Language Bias of Pairwise LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 3
  7. 2025Penalizing Length: Uncovering Systematic Bias in Quality Estimation Metricscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Are Large Reasoning Models Good Translation Evaluators? Analysis and Performance Boost
  2. 2026Unlocking Reasoning Capability on Machine Translation in Large Language Models
  3. 2025How Well Do Large Reasoning Models Translate? A Comprehensive Evaluation for Multi-Domain Machine Translation
  4. 2026Reasoning about In-Context Samples for Machine-Translation
  5. 2025New Trends for Modern Machine Translation with Large Reasoning Models
  6. 2025Test-Time Scaling of Reasoning Models for Machine Translation
  7. 2025TASER: Translation Assessment via Systematic Evaluation and Reasoning
  8. 2024Large Language Model for Multi-Domain Translation: Benchmarking and Domain CoT Fine-tuning