Reproducibility study of "LICO: Explainable Models with Language-Image Consistency"
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing reproducibility crisis in machine learning has brought forward a need for careful examination of research findings. This paper investigates the claims made by Lei et al. (2023) regarding their proposed method, LICO, for enhancing post-hoc interpretability techniques and improving image classification performance. LICO leverages natural language supervision from a vision-language model to enrich feature representations and guide the learning process. We conduct a comprehensive reproducibility study, employing (Wide) ResNets and established interpretability methods like Grad-CAM and RISE. We were mostly unable to reproduce the authors' results. In particular, we did not find that LICO consistently led to improved classification performance or improvements in quantitative and qualitative measures of interpretability. Thus, our findings highlight the importance of rigorous evaluation and transparent reporting in interpretability research.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
8 more
- 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
- 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 159
- 2021PartImageNet: A Large, High-Quality Dataset of Partscited by 107
- 2022Leakage and the Reproducibility Crisis in ML-based Sciencecited by 63
- 2021Group-CAM: Group Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 36
- 2020Learning Soft Labels via Meta Learningcited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Metric-Guided Synthesis of Class Activation Mappingcited by 0
- 2025Metric-Guided Synthesis of Class Activation Mapping14 Apr 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023LICO: Explainable Models with Language-Image Consistency
- 2026DEX-AR: A Dynamic Explainability Method for Autoregressive Vision-Language Models
- 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models
- 2024Revisiting MLLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of Image Classification Abilities
- 2024LVLM-Interpret: An Interpretability Tool for Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025Large Language Models Facilitate Vision Reflection in Image Classification
- 2024FastRM: An efficient and automatic explainability framework for multimodal generative models
- 2024Evolving Interpretable Visual Classifiers with Large Language Models