mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Think Thrice Before You Act: Progressive Thought Refinement in Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.13413 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated that progressive refinement, rather than providing a single answer, results in more accurate and thoughtful outputs. However, existing methods often rely heavily on supervision signals to evaluate previous responses, making it difficult to assess output quality in more open-ended scenarios effectively. Additionally, these methods are typically designed for specific tasks, which limits their generalization to new domains. To address these limitations, we propose Progressive Thought Refinement (PTR), a framework that enables LLMs to refine their responses progressively. PTR operates in two phases: (1) Thought data construction stage: We propose a weak and strong model collaborative selection strategy to build a high-quality progressive refinement dataset to ensure logical consistency from thought to answers, and the answers are gradually refined in each round. (2) Thought-Mask Fine-Tuning Phase: We design a training structure to mask the "thought" and adjust loss weights to encourage LLMs to refine prior thought, teaching them to implicitly understand "how to improve" rather than "what is correct." Experimental results show that PTR significantly enhances LLM performance across ten diverse tasks (avg. from 49.6% to 53.5%) without task-specific fine-tuning. Notably, in more open-ended tasks, LLMs also demonstrate substantial improvements in the quality of responses beyond mere accuracy, suggesting that PTR truly teaches LLMs to self-improve over time.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 44 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.

Builds on

44 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing18 Apr
  2. 2024Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectives4 Jan
  3. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet3 Oct
  4. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies6 Aug
  5. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing19 May
  6. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar

Other references · 38

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  8. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  9. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  12. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
26 more
  1. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  2. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  3. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  5. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  6. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  7. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  8. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  9. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  10. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  11. 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
  12. 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 250
  13. 2019WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scalecited by 194
  14. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 176
  15. 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 163
  16. 2024NATURAL PLAN: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural Language Planningcited by 125
  17. 2024GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local Refinementscited by 101
  18. 2023RCOT: Detecting and Rectifying Factual Inconsistency in Reasoning by Reversing Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 47
  19. 2023A New Era in Software Security: Towards Self-Healing Software via Large Language Models and Formal Verificationcited by 42
  20. 2024Prompting Techniques for Secure Code Generation: A Systematic Investigationcited by 33
  21. 2023AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisationcited by 31
  22. 2023LeTI: Learning to Generate from Textual Interactionscited by 25
  23. 2024Small Language Model Can Self-correctcited by 23
  24. 2024Progress or Regress? Self-Improvement Reversal in Post-trainingcited by 23
  25. 2023Explaining Competitive-Level Programming Solutions using LLMscited by 13
  26. 2023Enabling Language Models to Implicitly Learn Self-Improvementcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PonderLM-2: Pretraining LLM with Latent Thoughts in Continuous Space
  2. 2025Rethinking Thinking Tokens: LLMs as Improvement Operators
  3. 2024Teaching LLMs to Refine with Tools
  4. 2025What makes Reasoning Models Different? Follow the Reasoning Leader for Efficient Decoding
  5. 2025Refine-n-Judge: Curating High-Quality Preference Chains for LLM-Fine-Tuning
  6. 2025Thinker: Learning to Think Fast and Slow
  7. 2025Reasoning to Learn from Latent Thoughts
  8. 2025THiNK: Can Large Language Models Think-aloud?