Teaching LLMs to Refine with Tools
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) can refine their responses based on feedback, enabling self-improvement through iterative training or test-time refinement. However, existing methods predominantly focus on refinement within the same reasoning format, which may lead to non-correcting behaviors. We propose CaP, a novel approach that uses external tools to refine chain-of-thought (CoT) responses generated by the same or other LLMs. CaP employs a two-stage training process: supervised fine-tuning followed by preference optimization with DPO variants. Our observations highlight the critical role of preference optimization in enabling effective refinement. Additionally, we compare several sampling strategies to leverage CoT and tools at inference time. Experimental results demonstrate CaP's potential for effective cross-reasoning refinement and efficient inference.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Refine-n-Judge: Curating High-Quality Preference Chains for LLM-Fine-Tuning
- 2024Fine-Tuning on Diverse Reasoning Chains Drives Within-Inference CoT Refinement in LLMs
- 2025Unlocking Recursive Thinking of LLMs: Alignment via Refinement
- 2025RefineBench: Evaluating Refinement Capability of Language Models via Checklists
- 2025Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of Optimization
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback
- 2025Learning to Refine: Self-Refinement of Parallel Reasoning in LLMs
- 2025Evolving LLMs' Self-Refinement Capability via Synergistic Training-Inference Optimization