Beyond Coarse-Grained Matching in Video-Text Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Video-text retrieval has seen significant advancements, yet the ability of models to discern subtle differences in captions still requires verification. In this paper, we introduce a new approach for fine-grained evaluation. Our approach can be applied to existing datasets by automatically generating hard negative test captions with subtle single-word variations across nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and prepositions. We perform comprehensive experiments using four state-of-the-art models across two standard benchmarks (MSR-VTT and VATEX) and two specially curated datasets enriched with detailed descriptions (VLN-UVO and VLN-OOPS), resulting in a number of novel insights: 1) our analyses show that the current evaluation benchmarks fall short in detecting a model's ability to perceive subtle single-word differences, 2) our fine-grained evaluation highlights the difficulty models face in distinguishing such subtle variations. To enhance fine-grained understanding, we propose a new baseline that can be easily combined with current methods. Experiments on our fine-grained evaluations demonstrate that this approach enhances a model's ability to understand fine-grained differences.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
49 of 63 references.
References · 49
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2021Frozen in Time: A Joint Video and Image Encoder for End-to-End Retrievalcited by 1,177
- 2017Dense-Captioning Events in Videoscited by 793
- 2017Localizing Moments in Video with Natural Languagecited by 663
- 2021CLIP4Clip: An Empirical Study of CLIP for End to End Video Clip Retrievalcited by 651
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
- 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
- 2021Less is More: ClipBERT for Video-and-Language Learning via Sparse Samplingcited by 484
- 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
37 more
- 2019VATEX: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Multilingual Dataset for Video-and-Language Researchcited by 414
- 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 402
- 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 300
- 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 280
- 2021CLIP2Video: Mastering Video-Text Retrieval via Image CLIPcited by 225
- 2018A Joint Sequence Fusion Model for Video Question Answering and Retrievalcited by 208
- 2022MERLOT Reserve: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Soundcited by 184
- 2020Fine-grained Video-Text Retrieval with Hierarchical Graph Reasoningcited by 180
- 2022Revisiting the "Video" in Video-Language Understandingcited by 169
- 2016TGIF: A New Dataset and Benchmark on Animated GIF Descriptioncited by 124
- 2022VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relationscited by 114
- 2021Probing Image-Language Transformers for Verb Understandingcited by 109
- 2022TS2-Net: Token Shift and Selection Transformer for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 104
- 2021T2VLAD: Global-Local Sequence Alignment for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 103
- 2021TACo: Token-aware Cascade Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Alignmentcited by 102
- 2019Fine-Grained Action Retrieval Through Multiple Parts-of-Speech Embeddingscited by 101
- 2017FOIL it! Find One mismatch between Image and Language captioncited by 95
- 2021TEACHTEXT: CrossModal Generalized Distillation for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 81
- 2023Verbs in Action: Improving verb understanding in video-language modelscited by 76
- 2022A CLIP-Hitchhiker's Guide to Long Video Retrievalcited by 57
- 2023Test of Time: Instilling Video-Language Models with a Sense of Timecited by 51
- 2023Unified Coarse-to-Fine Alignment for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 49
- 2020Fine-grained Visual Textual Alignment for Cross-Modal Retrieval using Transformer Encoderscited by 47
- 2021On Semantic Similarity in Video Retrievalcited by 46
- 2016Learning Language-Visual Embedding for Movie Understanding with Natural-Languagecited by 41
- 2023UniAdapter: Unified Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Cross-modal Modelingcited by 40
- 2022Cross-Modal Adapter for Vision-Language Retrievalcited by 35
- 2023CiCo: Domain-Aware Sign Language Retrieval via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learningcited by 33
- 2019Action Modifiers: Learning from Adverbs in Instructional Videoscited by 27
- 2023Connecting Vision and Language with Video Localized Narrativescited by 24
- 2021Lightweight Attentional Feature Fusion: A New Baseline for Text-to-Video Retrievalcited by 23
- 2022Learn to Understand Negation in Video Retrievalcited by 16
- 2022Leveraging per Image-Token Consistency for Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 9
- 2022What's in a Caption? Dataset-Specific Linguistic Diversity and Its Effect on Visual Description Models and Metricscited by 6
- 2022TokenFlow: Rethinking Fine-grained Cross-modal Alignment in Vision-Language Retrievalcited by 6
- 2023ICSVR: Investigating Compositional and Syntactic Understanding in Video Retrieval Modelscited by 4
- 2021Negative Sample is Negative in Its Own Way: Tailoring Negative Sentences for Image-Text Retrievalcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Adapting MLLMs for Nuanced Video Retrievalcited by 0
- 2025Adapting MLLMs for Nuanced Video Retrieval15 Dec 2025