mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What's in a Caption? Dataset-Specific Linguistic Diversity and Its Effect on Visual Description Models and Metrics

arXiv 2205.06253 ↗First posted 12 May 2022cs.CV cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While there have been significant gains in the field of automated video description, the generalization performance of automated description models to novel domains remains a major barrier to using these systems in the real world. Most visual description methods are known to capture and exploit patterns in the training data leading to evaluation metric increases, but what are those patterns? In this work, we examine several popular visual description datasets, and capture, analyze, and understand the dataset-specific linguistic patterns that models exploit but do not generalize to new domains. At the token level, sample level, and dataset level, we find that caption diversity is a major driving factor behind the generation of generic and uninformative captions. We further show that state-of-the-art models even outperform held-out ground truth captions on modern metrics, and that this effect is an artifact of linguistic diversity in datasets. Understanding this linguistic diversity is key to building strong captioning models, we recommend several methods and approaches for maintaining diversity in the collection of new data, and dealing with the consequences of limited diversity when using current models and metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.

Builds on

36 of 59 references.

References · 36

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  5. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  6. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  7. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  8. 2019HowTo100M: Learning a Text-Video Embedding by Watching Hundred Million Narrated Video Clipscited by 946
  9. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  10. 2017Dense-Captioning Events in Videoscited by 789
  11. 2017Towards Automatic Learning of Procedures from Web Instructional Videoscited by 616
  12. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
24 more
  1. 2019VATEX: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Multilingual Dataset for Video-and-Language Researchcited by 412
  2. 2018A Short Note about Kinetics-600cited by 331
  3. 2020Long-Tailed Classification by Keeping the Good and Removing the Bad Momentum Causal Effectcited by 256
  4. 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
  5. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
  6. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  7. 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
  8. 2016Video Summarization with Long Short-term Memorycited by 142
  9. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  10. 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
  11. 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
  12. 2020Object Relational Graph with Teacher-Recommended Learning for Video Captioningcited by 106
  13. 2020Don't Judge an Object by Its Context: Learning to Overcome Contextual Biascited by 91
  14. 2020Deconfounded Image Captioning: A Causal Retrospectcited by 65
  15. 2019TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluationcited by 58
  16. 2021Spoken Moments: Learning Joint Audio-Visual Representations from Video Descriptionscited by 53
  17. 2021Worst of Both Worlds: Biases Compound in Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 52
  18. 2020Mitigating Gender Bias in Captioning Systemscited by 50
  19. 2020Learning to Model and Ignore Dataset Bias with Mixed Capacity Ensemblescited by 43
  20. 2019Exposing and Correcting the Gender Bias in Image Captioning Datasets and Modelscited by 36
  21. 2020Gender Slopes: Counterfactual Fairness for Computer Vision Models by Attribute Manipulationcited by 36
  22. 2021SMURF: SeMantic and linguistic UndeRstanding Fusion for Caption Evaluation via Typicality Analysiscited by 18
  23. 2021O2NA: An Object-Oriented Non-Autoregressive Approach for Controllable Video Captioningcited by 18
  24. 2018Video Description: A Survey of Methods, Datasets and Evaluation Metricscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.